Tošković, Oliver

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
52bf6275-f2e2-4ba1-98a0-97a4b882435e
  • Tošković, Oliver (3)
Projects

Author's Bibliography

Nonsuicidal Self-Injury (NSSI) in Serbia: Nationally representative sample study

Radanović, Ana; Kostić, Milutin; Pejović-Milovančević, Milica; Tošković, Oliver; Videnović, Marina; Mitković-Vončina, Marija; Radosavljev-Kirćanski, Jelena; Mandić-Maravić, Vanja; Lazarević, Ljiljana B.

(Elsevier, 2022)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Radanović, Ana
AU  - Kostić, Milutin
AU  - Pejović-Milovančević, Milica
AU  - Tošković, Oliver
AU  - Videnović, Marina
AU  - Mitković-Vončina, Marija
AU  - Radosavljev-Kirćanski, Jelena
AU  - Mandić-Maravić, Vanja
AU  - Lazarević, Ljiljana B.
PY  - 2022
UR  - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772598722000320
UR  - http://ipir.ipisr.org.rs/handle/123456789/813
AB  - Although NSSI has been drawing the attention of researchers intensely for the last 30 years, to date there is no published study about rates of NSSI behaviors in countries of south-eastern Europe. The study aimed to explore NSSI in the Republic of Serbia. Data were collected using multistage random sampling. The final sample consisted of 2792 participants (57.4% female) while the NSSI subsample consisted of 405 participants (54.3% males). Results showed the NSSI rate in Serbia is 4.3% based on a percentage of people who answered affirmatively to lifetime NSSI engagement. However, when the percentage of people who reported at least one positive answer through the NSSI behaviors checklist, the rate rises to 14.5%. The most frequent NSSI behavior is wound picking. NSSI rate drops to 8.8% when wound picking is excluded. Those engaged in NSSI were more likely to report suicide attempts and seek professional help than those who did not report NSSI. Gender differences in NSSI frequency are found only in cases of headbanging and burning oneself. This study showed the scope of NSSI-related problems is similar in Serbia compared to other countries. It also raised questions about the lack of preventive programs and treatment strategies for dealing with NSSI in Serbia.
PB  - Elsevier
T2  - Psychiatry Research Communications
T2  - Psychiatry Research CommunicationsPsychiatry Research Communications
T1  - Nonsuicidal Self-Injury (NSSI) in Serbia: Nationally representative sample study
IS  - 3
SP  - 100051
VL  - 2
DO  - 10.1016/j.psycom.2022.100051
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Radanović, Ana and Kostić, Milutin and Pejović-Milovančević, Milica and Tošković, Oliver and Videnović, Marina and Mitković-Vončina, Marija and Radosavljev-Kirćanski, Jelena and Mandić-Maravić, Vanja and Lazarević, Ljiljana B.",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Although NSSI has been drawing the attention of researchers intensely for the last 30 years, to date there is no published study about rates of NSSI behaviors in countries of south-eastern Europe. The study aimed to explore NSSI in the Republic of Serbia. Data were collected using multistage random sampling. The final sample consisted of 2792 participants (57.4% female) while the NSSI subsample consisted of 405 participants (54.3% males). Results showed the NSSI rate in Serbia is 4.3% based on a percentage of people who answered affirmatively to lifetime NSSI engagement. However, when the percentage of people who reported at least one positive answer through the NSSI behaviors checklist, the rate rises to 14.5%. The most frequent NSSI behavior is wound picking. NSSI rate drops to 8.8% when wound picking is excluded. Those engaged in NSSI were more likely to report suicide attempts and seek professional help than those who did not report NSSI. Gender differences in NSSI frequency are found only in cases of headbanging and burning oneself. This study showed the scope of NSSI-related problems is similar in Serbia compared to other countries. It also raised questions about the lack of preventive programs and treatment strategies for dealing with NSSI in Serbia.",
publisher = "Elsevier",
journal = "Psychiatry Research Communications, Psychiatry Research CommunicationsPsychiatry Research Communications",
title = "Nonsuicidal Self-Injury (NSSI) in Serbia: Nationally representative sample study",
number = "3",
pages = "100051",
volume = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.psycom.2022.100051"
}
Radanović, A., Kostić, M., Pejović-Milovančević, M., Tošković, O., Videnović, M., Mitković-Vončina, M., Radosavljev-Kirćanski, J., Mandić-Maravić, V.,& Lazarević, L. B.. (2022). Nonsuicidal Self-Injury (NSSI) in Serbia: Nationally representative sample study. in Psychiatry Research Communications
Elsevier., 2(3), 100051.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psycom.2022.100051
Radanović A, Kostić M, Pejović-Milovančević M, Tošković O, Videnović M, Mitković-Vončina M, Radosavljev-Kirćanski J, Mandić-Maravić V, Lazarević LB. Nonsuicidal Self-Injury (NSSI) in Serbia: Nationally representative sample study. in Psychiatry Research Communications. 2022;2(3):100051.
doi:10.1016/j.psycom.2022.100051 .
Radanović, Ana, Kostić, Milutin, Pejović-Milovančević, Milica, Tošković, Oliver, Videnović, Marina, Mitković-Vončina, Marija, Radosavljev-Kirćanski, Jelena, Mandić-Maravić, Vanja, Lazarević, Ljiljana B., "Nonsuicidal Self-Injury (NSSI) in Serbia: Nationally representative sample study" in Psychiatry Research Communications, 2, no. 3 (2022):100051,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psycom.2022.100051 . .
4

Ljubav prema istraživanjima u doba korone

Tošković, Oliver; Smederevac, Snežana; Marić Bojović, Nađa; Ignjatović Ristić, Dragana; Stojković, Ana

(Beograd : Društvo psihologa Srbije, 2020)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Tošković, Oliver
AU  - Smederevac, Snežana
AU  - Marić Bojović, Nađa
AU  - Ignjatović Ristić, Dragana
AU  - Stojković, Ana
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://ipir.ipisr.org.rs/handle/123456789/587
AB  - Iako su nam dobro poznata psihološka istraživanja u kojima su kao „ispitanici“ učestvovale životnje, jasno je da
najveći broj naših studija podrazumeva intenzivnu interakciju i komunikaciju sa ljudima. Kada je reč o
kvantitativnim istraživanjima, ispitivač u relativno kratkom vremenskom periodu uspostavlja kontakt sa velikim
brojem osoba, pri čemu se često regrutuju prigodni uzorci (učenika, studenata ili zaposlenih u jednoj radnoj
organizaciji), tako da se učesnici u istraživanju mogu okupiti u većim grupama na jednom mestu. Ako se, pak,
istraživanje sprovodi na nacionalno reprezentativnom uzorku, ispitivači će najverovatnije biti u prilici da putuju,
zalazeći u sve krajeve nekog regiona i često kontaktirajući sa ispitanicima u njihovim domovima. U psihološkim
studijama, koje se oslanjaju na kvalitativnu metodologiju, istraživač je, po pravilu, u dodiru s manjim brojem
osoba, ali je kontakt s njima utoliko „bliži“ i često podrazumeva dugotrajnu komunikaciju licem u lice.
Početkom 2020. godine Svetska zdravstvena organizacija proglasila je pandemiju novog virusa korona SARSCoV-
2, koji izaziva oboljenje poznato pod skraćenicom kovid 19 (Corona virus disease 2019). Većina država,
uključujući i Srbiju, kao odgovor na pandemiju propisala je mere koje su imale cilj da smanje fizičke kontakte
među ljudima, kako bi se usporilo prenošenje virusa u populaciji. Srbija je jedna od retkih država koje su uvele i
vanredno stanje, uključujući i ograničenje kretanja građana tokom velikog dela dana (takozvani „policijski čas“).
Mnogi od gorenavedenih aspekata psiholoških istraživanja – okupljanje većeg broja ispitanika u jednoj prostoriji,
odlazak ispitivača u različite krajeve zemlje i ulaženje u brojna domaćinstva, razgovor u fokus-grupama – time
su postali praktično nemogući, ali je jednako bila nezamisliva ideja da se ta istraživanja obustave. Ovo posebno
stoga što su promene u načinu života tokom pandemije otvorile i sasvim nova psihološka pitanja ili stvorile
potrebu da se već istraživani psihološki problemi ispitaju u novonastalim okolnostima.
Na ovom okruglom stolu pozabavićemo se, s jedne strane, preprekama na koje su istraživači naišli s pojavom
pandemije kovida 19 i rešenjima koja su uspeli da iznađu: Na koji način organizovati metodološki korektna
psihološka istraživanja u uslovima ograničenih fizičkih kontakata i kretanja? Da li je i kako moguće doći do
ispitanika? Kakvu ulogu u prikupljanju podataka i formiranju uzoraka ima onaljn zadavanje upitničkih mera i
kakva su merenja psiholoških fenomen uopšte moguća u onlajn okruženju? S druge strane, osvrnućemo se i
na psihološka pitanja koja je pandemija takoreći postavila pred istraživače: Kako fizičko distanciranje od
drugih osoba, izolacija, ograničenje sloboda, rad od kuće i prelazak u onlajn okruženje menjaju naše mentalno
zdravlje i psihičko funkcionisanje uopšte? Da li nam je pandemija donekle omogućila uslove prirodnog
eksperimenta za ispitivanje efekata navedenih pojava na ljudsku psihu?
PB  - Beograd : Društvo psihologa Srbije
C3  - Psihologija iz dana u dan [Elektronski izvor] : svakodnevni problemi u praksi psihologa i primena psihologije u svakodnevnom životu
T1  - Ljubav prema istraživanjima u doba korone
EP  - 19
SP  - 19
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ipir_587
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Tošković, Oliver and Smederevac, Snežana and Marić Bojović, Nađa and Ignjatović Ristić, Dragana and Stojković, Ana",
year = "2020",
abstract = "Iako su nam dobro poznata psihološka istraživanja u kojima su kao „ispitanici“ učestvovale životnje, jasno je da
najveći broj naših studija podrazumeva intenzivnu interakciju i komunikaciju sa ljudima. Kada je reč o
kvantitativnim istraživanjima, ispitivač u relativno kratkom vremenskom periodu uspostavlja kontakt sa velikim
brojem osoba, pri čemu se često regrutuju prigodni uzorci (učenika, studenata ili zaposlenih u jednoj radnoj
organizaciji), tako da se učesnici u istraživanju mogu okupiti u većim grupama na jednom mestu. Ako se, pak,
istraživanje sprovodi na nacionalno reprezentativnom uzorku, ispitivači će najverovatnije biti u prilici da putuju,
zalazeći u sve krajeve nekog regiona i često kontaktirajući sa ispitanicima u njihovim domovima. U psihološkim
studijama, koje se oslanjaju na kvalitativnu metodologiju, istraživač je, po pravilu, u dodiru s manjim brojem
osoba, ali je kontakt s njima utoliko „bliži“ i često podrazumeva dugotrajnu komunikaciju licem u lice.
Početkom 2020. godine Svetska zdravstvena organizacija proglasila je pandemiju novog virusa korona SARSCoV-
2, koji izaziva oboljenje poznato pod skraćenicom kovid 19 (Corona virus disease 2019). Većina država,
uključujući i Srbiju, kao odgovor na pandemiju propisala je mere koje su imale cilj da smanje fizičke kontakte
među ljudima, kako bi se usporilo prenošenje virusa u populaciji. Srbija je jedna od retkih država koje su uvele i
vanredno stanje, uključujući i ograničenje kretanja građana tokom velikog dela dana (takozvani „policijski čas“).
Mnogi od gorenavedenih aspekata psiholoških istraživanja – okupljanje većeg broja ispitanika u jednoj prostoriji,
odlazak ispitivača u različite krajeve zemlje i ulaženje u brojna domaćinstva, razgovor u fokus-grupama – time
su postali praktično nemogući, ali je jednako bila nezamisliva ideja da se ta istraživanja obustave. Ovo posebno
stoga što su promene u načinu života tokom pandemije otvorile i sasvim nova psihološka pitanja ili stvorile
potrebu da se već istraživani psihološki problemi ispitaju u novonastalim okolnostima.
Na ovom okruglom stolu pozabavićemo se, s jedne strane, preprekama na koje su istraživači naišli s pojavom
pandemije kovida 19 i rešenjima koja su uspeli da iznađu: Na koji način organizovati metodološki korektna
psihološka istraživanja u uslovima ograničenih fizičkih kontakata i kretanja? Da li je i kako moguće doći do
ispitanika? Kakvu ulogu u prikupljanju podataka i formiranju uzoraka ima onaljn zadavanje upitničkih mera i
kakva su merenja psiholoških fenomen uopšte moguća u onlajn okruženju? S druge strane, osvrnućemo se i
na psihološka pitanja koja je pandemija takoreći postavila pred istraživače: Kako fizičko distanciranje od
drugih osoba, izolacija, ograničenje sloboda, rad od kuće i prelazak u onlajn okruženje menjaju naše mentalno
zdravlje i psihičko funkcionisanje uopšte? Da li nam je pandemija donekle omogućila uslove prirodnog
eksperimenta za ispitivanje efekata navedenih pojava na ljudsku psihu?",
publisher = "Beograd : Društvo psihologa Srbije",
journal = "Psihologija iz dana u dan [Elektronski izvor] : svakodnevni problemi u praksi psihologa i primena psihologije u svakodnevnom životu",
title = "Ljubav prema istraživanjima u doba korone",
pages = "19-19",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ipir_587"
}
Tošković, O., Smederevac, S., Marić Bojović, N., Ignjatović Ristić, D.,& Stojković, A.. (2020). Ljubav prema istraživanjima u doba korone. in Psihologija iz dana u dan [Elektronski izvor] : svakodnevni problemi u praksi psihologa i primena psihologije u svakodnevnom životu
Beograd : Društvo psihologa Srbije., 19-19.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ipir_587
Tošković O, Smederevac S, Marić Bojović N, Ignjatović Ristić D, Stojković A. Ljubav prema istraživanjima u doba korone. in Psihologija iz dana u dan [Elektronski izvor] : svakodnevni problemi u praksi psihologa i primena psihologije u svakodnevnom životu. 2020;:19-19.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ipir_587 .
Tošković, Oliver, Smederevac, Snežana, Marić Bojović, Nađa, Ignjatović Ristić, Dragana, Stojković, Ana, "Ljubav prema istraživanjima u doba korone" in Psihologija iz dana u dan [Elektronski izvor] : svakodnevni problemi u praksi psihologa i primena psihologije u svakodnevnom životu (2020):19-19,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ipir_587 .

Flowers in the attic – adverse childhood experiences and their relations with life-outcome

Pejović Milovančević, Milica; Tošković, Oliver; Kostić, Milutin; Stojković, Ana

(Beograd : Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju, 2019)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Pejović Milovančević, Milica
AU  - Tošković, Oliver
AU  - Kostić, Milutin
AU  - Stojković, Ana
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://ipir.ipisr.org.rs/handle/123456789/588
AB  - This is an introductory abstract for other papers within this symposium, which are all part of
the same study, Research on Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) in Serbia. ACE is a
traumatic experience in one’s life occurring before the age of 18 that the person remembers as
an adult. The purpose of this survey was to explore the prevalence of ACEs and their correlates
on a sample of 18-65 years old in Serbia. We used multistage random sampling, with a stratified
cluster sample in the first (187 settlements were sampled from 4 regions), and random sample
in the second stage (a random-walk technique for sampling participants). The final sample
consisted of 2792 respondents (57.4% females), interviewed face-to-face. Instrument package
included: ACE International Questionnaire, Health Appraisal, Family Health History, Trauma
Symptom Checklist, Benevolent Childhood experience, Experiences in Close Relationships-
Revised, HEXACO, DELTA9, and Non-suicidal self-injury. Each ACE was represented by a
binary score, in two ways: (1) any ACE score implies that participant had a specific event at
least “once or twice”; (2) frequent ACE implies that participant had specific events “many
times”. Factor analysis, principal axis with varimax rotation extracted three dimensions:
violence (involvement in physical fight, bullying, community violence, physical abuse,
collective violence, psychological abuse), neglect (depression in family, suicide in family,
psychological neglect, sexual abuse and parental separation) and abuse (alcoholism in family,
abuse of mother or father by the partner, incarceration of family member, drug abuse in family
and physical neglect). If we use ACEs as predictors of various life events in multiple regression
analysis, the highest prediction is gained for a number of suicidal attempts (R2 = .53, F = 2.38;
df = 17, 36; p < 0.05) - more ACEs lead to more attempts, with psychological neglect as
strongest predictor. Most frequent ACEs in Serbia are community violence (any 69.4%;
frequent 37.7%), psychological abuse (any 43.7%; frequent 26.3%), and involvement in a
physical fight (any 37.7%; frequent 19.7%). For comparison, physical abuse and domestic
violence appeared more frequently in Serbia than in Wales study, while parent separation and
sexual abuse appeared a bit more frequently in Wales sample. Possible higher prevalence of This is an introductory abstract for other papers within this symposium, which are all part of
the same study, Research on Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) in Serbia. ACE is a
traumatic experience in one’s life occurring before the age of 18 that the person remembers as
an adult. The purpose of this survey was to explore the prevalence of ACEs and their correlates
on a sample of 18-65 years old in Serbia. We used multistage random sampling, with a stratified
cluster sample in the first (187 settlements were sampled from 4 regions), and random sample
in the second stage (a random-walk technique for sampling participants). The final sample
consisted of 2792 respondents (57.4% females), interviewed face-to-face. Instrument package
included: ACE International Questionnaire, Health Appraisal, Family Health History, Trauma
Symptom Checklist, Benevolent Childhood experience, Experiences in Close Relationships-
Revised, HEXACO, DELTA9, and Non-suicidal self-injury. Each ACE was represented by a
binary score, in two ways: (1) any ACE score implies that participant had a specific event at
least “once or twice”; (2) frequent ACE implies that participant had specific events “many
times”. Factor analysis, principal axis with varimax rotation extracted three dimensions:
violence (involvement in physical fight, bullying, community violence, physical abuse,
collective violence, psychological abuse), neglect (depression in family, suicide in family,
psychological neglect, sexual abuse and parental separation) and abuse (alcoholism in family,
abuse of mother or father by the partner, incarceration of family member, drug abuse in family
and physical neglect). If we use ACEs as predictors of various life events in multiple regression
analysis, the highest prediction is gained for a number of suicidal attempts (R2 = .53, F = 2.38;
df = 17, 36; p < 0.05) - more ACEs lead to more attempts, with psychological neglect as
strongest predictor. Most frequent ACEs in Serbia are community violence (any 69.4%;
frequent 37.7%), psychological abuse (any 43.7%; frequent 26.3%), and involvement in a
physical fight (any 37.7%; frequent 19.7%). For comparison, physical abuse and domestic
violence appeared more frequently in Serbia than in Wales study, while parent separation and
sexual abuse appeared a bit more frequently in Wales sample. Possible higher prevalence of This is an introductory abstract for other papers within this symposium, which are all part of
the same study, Research on Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) in Serbia. ACE is a
traumatic experience in one’s life occurring before the age of 18 that the person remembers as
an adult. The purpose of this survey was to explore the prevalence of ACEs and their correlates
on a sample of 18-65 years old in Serbia. We used multistage random sampling, with a stratified
cluster sample in the first (187 settlements were sampled from 4 regions), and random sample
in the second stage (a random-walk technique for sampling participants). The final sample
consisted of 2792 respondents (57.4% females), interviewed face-to-face. Instrument package
included: ACE International Questionnaire, Health Appraisal, Family Health History, Trauma
Symptom Checklist, Benevolent Childhood experience, Experiences in Close Relationships-
Revised, HEXACO, DELTA9, and Non-suicidal self-injury. Each ACE was represented by a
binary score, in two ways: (1) any ACE score implies that participant had a specific event at
least “once or twice”; (2) frequent ACE implies that participant had specific events “many
times”. Factor analysis, principal axis with varimax rotation extracted three dimensions:
violence (involvement in physical fight, bullying, community violence, physical abuse,
collective violence, psychological abuse), neglect (depression in family, suicide in family,
psychological neglect, sexual abuse and parental separation) and abuse (alcoholism in family,
abuse of mother or father by the partner, incarceration of family member, drug abuse in family
and physical neglect). If we use ACEs as predictors of various life events in multiple regression
analysis, the highest prediction is gained for a number of suicidal attempts (R2 = .53, F = 2.38;
df = 17, 36; p < 0.05) - more ACEs lead to more attempts, with psychological neglect as
strongest predictor. Most frequent ACEs in Serbia are community violence (any 69.4%;
frequent 37.7%), psychological abuse (any 43.7%; frequent 26.3%), and involvement in a
physical fight (any 37.7%; frequent 19.7%). For comparison, physical abuse and domestic
violence appeared more frequently in Serbia than in Wales study, while parent separation and
sexual abuse appeared a bit more frequently in Wales sample. Possible higher prevalence of ACEs in our study might occur due to the context of the collective experience of wars, civil
unrest, insecurity, etc.
PB  - Beograd : Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju
PB  - Beograd : Filozofski fakultet
C3  - Empirijska istraživanja u psihologiji
T1  - Flowers in the attic – adverse childhood experiences and their relations with life-outcome
EP  - 13
SP  - 13
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ipir_588
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Pejović Milovančević, Milica and Tošković, Oliver and Kostić, Milutin and Stojković, Ana",
year = "2019",
abstract = "This is an introductory abstract for other papers within this symposium, which are all part of
the same study, Research on Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) in Serbia. ACE is a
traumatic experience in one’s life occurring before the age of 18 that the person remembers as
an adult. The purpose of this survey was to explore the prevalence of ACEs and their correlates
on a sample of 18-65 years old in Serbia. We used multistage random sampling, with a stratified
cluster sample in the first (187 settlements were sampled from 4 regions), and random sample
in the second stage (a random-walk technique for sampling participants). The final sample
consisted of 2792 respondents (57.4% females), interviewed face-to-face. Instrument package
included: ACE International Questionnaire, Health Appraisal, Family Health History, Trauma
Symptom Checklist, Benevolent Childhood experience, Experiences in Close Relationships-
Revised, HEXACO, DELTA9, and Non-suicidal self-injury. Each ACE was represented by a
binary score, in two ways: (1) any ACE score implies that participant had a specific event at
least “once or twice”; (2) frequent ACE implies that participant had specific events “many
times”. Factor analysis, principal axis with varimax rotation extracted three dimensions:
violence (involvement in physical fight, bullying, community violence, physical abuse,
collective violence, psychological abuse), neglect (depression in family, suicide in family,
psychological neglect, sexual abuse and parental separation) and abuse (alcoholism in family,
abuse of mother or father by the partner, incarceration of family member, drug abuse in family
and physical neglect). If we use ACEs as predictors of various life events in multiple regression
analysis, the highest prediction is gained for a number of suicidal attempts (R2 = .53, F = 2.38;
df = 17, 36; p < 0.05) - more ACEs lead to more attempts, with psychological neglect as
strongest predictor. Most frequent ACEs in Serbia are community violence (any 69.4%;
frequent 37.7%), psychological abuse (any 43.7%; frequent 26.3%), and involvement in a
physical fight (any 37.7%; frequent 19.7%). For comparison, physical abuse and domestic
violence appeared more frequently in Serbia than in Wales study, while parent separation and
sexual abuse appeared a bit more frequently in Wales sample. Possible higher prevalence of This is an introductory abstract for other papers within this symposium, which are all part of
the same study, Research on Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) in Serbia. ACE is a
traumatic experience in one’s life occurring before the age of 18 that the person remembers as
an adult. The purpose of this survey was to explore the prevalence of ACEs and their correlates
on a sample of 18-65 years old in Serbia. We used multistage random sampling, with a stratified
cluster sample in the first (187 settlements were sampled from 4 regions), and random sample
in the second stage (a random-walk technique for sampling participants). The final sample
consisted of 2792 respondents (57.4% females), interviewed face-to-face. Instrument package
included: ACE International Questionnaire, Health Appraisal, Family Health History, Trauma
Symptom Checklist, Benevolent Childhood experience, Experiences in Close Relationships-
Revised, HEXACO, DELTA9, and Non-suicidal self-injury. Each ACE was represented by a
binary score, in two ways: (1) any ACE score implies that participant had a specific event at
least “once or twice”; (2) frequent ACE implies that participant had specific events “many
times”. Factor analysis, principal axis with varimax rotation extracted three dimensions:
violence (involvement in physical fight, bullying, community violence, physical abuse,
collective violence, psychological abuse), neglect (depression in family, suicide in family,
psychological neglect, sexual abuse and parental separation) and abuse (alcoholism in family,
abuse of mother or father by the partner, incarceration of family member, drug abuse in family
and physical neglect). If we use ACEs as predictors of various life events in multiple regression
analysis, the highest prediction is gained for a number of suicidal attempts (R2 = .53, F = 2.38;
df = 17, 36; p < 0.05) - more ACEs lead to more attempts, with psychological neglect as
strongest predictor. Most frequent ACEs in Serbia are community violence (any 69.4%;
frequent 37.7%), psychological abuse (any 43.7%; frequent 26.3%), and involvement in a
physical fight (any 37.7%; frequent 19.7%). For comparison, physical abuse and domestic
violence appeared more frequently in Serbia than in Wales study, while parent separation and
sexual abuse appeared a bit more frequently in Wales sample. Possible higher prevalence of This is an introductory abstract for other papers within this symposium, which are all part of
the same study, Research on Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) in Serbia. ACE is a
traumatic experience in one’s life occurring before the age of 18 that the person remembers as
an adult. The purpose of this survey was to explore the prevalence of ACEs and their correlates
on a sample of 18-65 years old in Serbia. We used multistage random sampling, with a stratified
cluster sample in the first (187 settlements were sampled from 4 regions), and random sample
in the second stage (a random-walk technique for sampling participants). The final sample
consisted of 2792 respondents (57.4% females), interviewed face-to-face. Instrument package
included: ACE International Questionnaire, Health Appraisal, Family Health History, Trauma
Symptom Checklist, Benevolent Childhood experience, Experiences in Close Relationships-
Revised, HEXACO, DELTA9, and Non-suicidal self-injury. Each ACE was represented by a
binary score, in two ways: (1) any ACE score implies that participant had a specific event at
least “once or twice”; (2) frequent ACE implies that participant had specific events “many
times”. Factor analysis, principal axis with varimax rotation extracted three dimensions:
violence (involvement in physical fight, bullying, community violence, physical abuse,
collective violence, psychological abuse), neglect (depression in family, suicide in family,
psychological neglect, sexual abuse and parental separation) and abuse (alcoholism in family,
abuse of mother or father by the partner, incarceration of family member, drug abuse in family
and physical neglect). If we use ACEs as predictors of various life events in multiple regression
analysis, the highest prediction is gained for a number of suicidal attempts (R2 = .53, F = 2.38;
df = 17, 36; p < 0.05) - more ACEs lead to more attempts, with psychological neglect as
strongest predictor. Most frequent ACEs in Serbia are community violence (any 69.4%;
frequent 37.7%), psychological abuse (any 43.7%; frequent 26.3%), and involvement in a
physical fight (any 37.7%; frequent 19.7%). For comparison, physical abuse and domestic
violence appeared more frequently in Serbia than in Wales study, while parent separation and
sexual abuse appeared a bit more frequently in Wales sample. Possible higher prevalence of ACEs in our study might occur due to the context of the collective experience of wars, civil
unrest, insecurity, etc.",
publisher = "Beograd : Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju, Beograd : Filozofski fakultet",
journal = "Empirijska istraživanja u psihologiji",
title = "Flowers in the attic – adverse childhood experiences and their relations with life-outcome",
pages = "13-13",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ipir_588"
}
Pejović Milovančević, M., Tošković, O., Kostić, M.,& Stojković, A.. (2019). Flowers in the attic – adverse childhood experiences and their relations with life-outcome. in Empirijska istraživanja u psihologiji
Beograd : Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju., 13-13.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ipir_588
Pejović Milovančević M, Tošković O, Kostić M, Stojković A. Flowers in the attic – adverse childhood experiences and their relations with life-outcome. in Empirijska istraživanja u psihologiji. 2019;:13-13.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ipir_588 .
Pejović Milovančević, Milica, Tošković, Oliver, Kostić, Milutin, Stojković, Ana, "Flowers in the attic – adverse childhood experiences and their relations with life-outcome" in Empirijska istraživanja u psihologiji (2019):13-13,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ipir_588 .