Baucal, Aleksandar

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
orcid::0000-0002-7965-7659
  • Baucal, Aleksandar (5)
Projects

Author's Bibliography

What makes peer collaborative problem solving productive or unproductive: A qualitative systematic review

Baucal, Aleksandar; Jošić, Smiljana; Stepanović Ilić, Ivana; Videnović, Marina; Ivanović, Jovan; Krstić, Ksenija

(2023)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Baucal, Aleksandar
AU  - Jošić, Smiljana
AU  - Stepanović Ilić, Ivana
AU  - Videnović, Marina
AU  - Ivanović, Jovan
AU  - Krstić, Ksenija
PY  - 2023
UR  - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X2300060X
UR  - http://ipir.ipisr.org.rs/handle/123456789/985
AB  - Global demands for collaborative problem solving (CPS) have sparked investigations of peer collaboration in the educational context. The aim of this systematic review was to identify and systematize research findings on (a) characteristics of productive and unproductive face-to-face (f2f) or synchronous CPS via digital devices among adolescents in the educational context, (b) training and scaffolding modalities enabling adolescents to engage in productive CPS, and (c) ways of supporting productive CPS by using digital resources. We conducted a thematic analysis of 160 selected papers from a larger corpus and identified six main themes, that is, groups of characteristics of CPS: socio-cognitive aspects; socio-emotional aspects; the quality of task/problem-solving strategies; regulation of group activity oriented towards the task; regulation of group activity oriented towards group members; and participant engagement in CPS. We found that in efforts to contribute to successful CPS, adults (teachers/researchers) can moderate peer interaction in three ways, by focusing on either cognitive processes, group discussions, or classroom management. Regarding the third goal, we identified two major roles of digital resources in adolescent CPS. The first role pertained to ICT as a source of relevant knowledge or a tool for problem solving and the other role was related to peer collaboration and ICT as a tool for scaffolding collaboration. All characteristics that emerged in this review are discussed and concluding comments refer to educational implications.
T2  - Educational Research Review
T1  - What makes peer collaborative problem solving productive or unproductive: A qualitative systematic review
SP  - 100567
VL  - n/a
DO  - 10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100567
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Baucal, Aleksandar and Jošić, Smiljana and Stepanović Ilić, Ivana and Videnović, Marina and Ivanović, Jovan and Krstić, Ksenija",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Global demands for collaborative problem solving (CPS) have sparked investigations of peer collaboration in the educational context. The aim of this systematic review was to identify and systematize research findings on (a) characteristics of productive and unproductive face-to-face (f2f) or synchronous CPS via digital devices among adolescents in the educational context, (b) training and scaffolding modalities enabling adolescents to engage in productive CPS, and (c) ways of supporting productive CPS by using digital resources. We conducted a thematic analysis of 160 selected papers from a larger corpus and identified six main themes, that is, groups of characteristics of CPS: socio-cognitive aspects; socio-emotional aspects; the quality of task/problem-solving strategies; regulation of group activity oriented towards the task; regulation of group activity oriented towards group members; and participant engagement in CPS. We found that in efforts to contribute to successful CPS, adults (teachers/researchers) can moderate peer interaction in three ways, by focusing on either cognitive processes, group discussions, or classroom management. Regarding the third goal, we identified two major roles of digital resources in adolescent CPS. The first role pertained to ICT as a source of relevant knowledge or a tool for problem solving and the other role was related to peer collaboration and ICT as a tool for scaffolding collaboration. All characteristics that emerged in this review are discussed and concluding comments refer to educational implications.",
journal = "Educational Research Review",
title = "What makes peer collaborative problem solving productive or unproductive: A qualitative systematic review",
pages = "100567",
volume = "n/a",
doi = "10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100567"
}
Baucal, A., Jošić, S., Stepanović Ilić, I., Videnović, M., Ivanović, J.,& Krstić, K.. (2023). What makes peer collaborative problem solving productive or unproductive: A qualitative systematic review. in Educational Research Review, n/a, 100567.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100567
Baucal A, Jošić S, Stepanović Ilić I, Videnović M, Ivanović J, Krstić K. What makes peer collaborative problem solving productive or unproductive: A qualitative systematic review. in Educational Research Review. 2023;n/a:100567.
doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100567 .
Baucal, Aleksandar, Jošić, Smiljana, Stepanović Ilić, Ivana, Videnović, Marina, Ivanović, Jovan, Krstić, Ksenija, "What makes peer collaborative problem solving productive or unproductive: A qualitative systematic review" in Educational Research Review, n/a (2023):100567,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100567 . .
2

From collaboration to solutions: Encouraging collaborative problem solving through school practice

Baucal, Aleksandar; Pavlović Babić, Dragica; Altaras Dimitrijević, Ana; Krstić, Ksenija; Jolić Marjanović, Zorana; Stepanović Ilić, Ivana; Videnović, Marina; Jošić, Smiljana; Nikitović, Tijana; Mojović Zdravković, Kristina; Rajić, Milana; Ivanović, Jovan

(Serbia : Faculty of Technical Sciences Čačak, 2022)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Baucal, Aleksandar
AU  - Pavlović Babić, Dragica
AU  - Altaras Dimitrijević, Ana
AU  - Krstić, Ksenija
AU  - Jolić Marjanović, Zorana
AU  - Stepanović Ilić, Ivana
AU  - Videnović, Marina
AU  - Jošić, Smiljana
AU  - Nikitović, Tijana
AU  - Mojović Zdravković, Kristina
AU  - Rajić, Milana
AU  - Ivanović, Jovan
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://ipir.ipisr.org.rs/handle/123456789/863
AB  - The aim of this paper is to present a viable, psychologically based framework designed for systematical promotion of the adolescents’ capacities for collaborative problem solving and possibilities for their cultivation through everyday school practice. Specifically, a model for designing teacher-training programs is proposed, wherein several elements of effective collaborative problem solving are drawn together.
PB  - Serbia : Faculty of Technical Sciences Čačak
C3  - Technics and informatics in education – TIE 2022
T1  - From collaboration to solutions: Encouraging collaborative problem solving through school practice
EP  - 472
SP  - 470
DO  - 10.46793/TIE22.470B
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Baucal, Aleksandar and Pavlović Babić, Dragica and Altaras Dimitrijević, Ana and Krstić, Ksenija and Jolić Marjanović, Zorana and Stepanović Ilić, Ivana and Videnović, Marina and Jošić, Smiljana and Nikitović, Tijana and Mojović Zdravković, Kristina and Rajić, Milana and Ivanović, Jovan",
year = "2022",
abstract = "The aim of this paper is to present a viable, psychologically based framework designed for systematical promotion of the adolescents’ capacities for collaborative problem solving and possibilities for their cultivation through everyday school practice. Specifically, a model for designing teacher-training programs is proposed, wherein several elements of effective collaborative problem solving are drawn together.",
publisher = "Serbia : Faculty of Technical Sciences Čačak",
journal = "Technics and informatics in education – TIE 2022",
title = "From collaboration to solutions: Encouraging collaborative problem solving through school practice",
pages = "472-470",
doi = "10.46793/TIE22.470B"
}
Baucal, A., Pavlović Babić, D., Altaras Dimitrijević, A., Krstić, K., Jolić Marjanović, Z., Stepanović Ilić, I., Videnović, M., Jošić, S., Nikitović, T., Mojović Zdravković, K., Rajić, M.,& Ivanović, J.. (2022). From collaboration to solutions: Encouraging collaborative problem solving through school practice. in Technics and informatics in education – TIE 2022
Serbia : Faculty of Technical Sciences Čačak., 470-472.
https://doi.org/10.46793/TIE22.470B
Baucal A, Pavlović Babić D, Altaras Dimitrijević A, Krstić K, Jolić Marjanović Z, Stepanović Ilić I, Videnović M, Jošić S, Nikitović T, Mojović Zdravković K, Rajić M, Ivanović J. From collaboration to solutions: Encouraging collaborative problem solving through school practice. in Technics and informatics in education – TIE 2022. 2022;:470-472.
doi:10.46793/TIE22.470B .
Baucal, Aleksandar, Pavlović Babić, Dragica, Altaras Dimitrijević, Ana, Krstić, Ksenija, Jolić Marjanović, Zorana, Stepanović Ilić, Ivana, Videnović, Marina, Jošić, Smiljana, Nikitović, Tijana, Mojović Zdravković, Kristina, Rajić, Milana, Ivanović, Jovan, "From collaboration to solutions: Encouraging collaborative problem solving through school practice" in Technics and informatics in education – TIE 2022 (2022):470-472,
https://doi.org/10.46793/TIE22.470B . .
1

Dialogical PISA: correct answers are all alike, every incorrect answer is incorrect in its own way

Baucal, Aleksandar; Pavlović-Babić, Dragica; Jošić, Smiljana

(Springer, New York, 2018)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Baucal, Aleksandar
AU  - Pavlović-Babić, Dragica
AU  - Jošić, Smiljana
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://ipir.ipisr.org.rs/handle/123456789/302
AB  - Why do students give incorrect answers in PISA? What are the reasons for giving incorrect answers? Do all incorrect answers reflect only the lack of competence or might even a competent child make a mistake? The aim of this article is to contribute to a better understanding of these issues. In the current investigation, we selected six students who responded incorrectly to one PISA question in mathematics or science when they solved it individually. Then, we analyzed their understanding of the PISA task and their reasoning about it through a dialogical problem solving in triads to identify why they made an incorrect answer. Moreover, we tried to determine how the shared peer interaction might change the understanding and reasoning of the child and enable her/him to solve the task. The results of this study illustrate the differences between incorrect answers reflecting lack of competence and those incorrect answers, which appear for some other reasons. Based on the dialogical problem solving approach, we analyzed these two types of incorrect answers and the reasoning trajectories behind them.
PB  - Springer, New York
T2  - European Journal of Psychology of Education
T1  - Dialogical PISA: correct answers are all alike, every incorrect answer is incorrect in its own way
EP  - 487
IS  - 3
SP  - 467
VL  - 33
DO  - 10.1007/s10212-018-0371-3
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Baucal, Aleksandar and Pavlović-Babić, Dragica and Jošić, Smiljana",
year = "2018",
abstract = "Why do students give incorrect answers in PISA? What are the reasons for giving incorrect answers? Do all incorrect answers reflect only the lack of competence or might even a competent child make a mistake? The aim of this article is to contribute to a better understanding of these issues. In the current investigation, we selected six students who responded incorrectly to one PISA question in mathematics or science when they solved it individually. Then, we analyzed their understanding of the PISA task and their reasoning about it through a dialogical problem solving in triads to identify why they made an incorrect answer. Moreover, we tried to determine how the shared peer interaction might change the understanding and reasoning of the child and enable her/him to solve the task. The results of this study illustrate the differences between incorrect answers reflecting lack of competence and those incorrect answers, which appear for some other reasons. Based on the dialogical problem solving approach, we analyzed these two types of incorrect answers and the reasoning trajectories behind them.",
publisher = "Springer, New York",
journal = "European Journal of Psychology of Education",
title = "Dialogical PISA: correct answers are all alike, every incorrect answer is incorrect in its own way",
pages = "487-467",
number = "3",
volume = "33",
doi = "10.1007/s10212-018-0371-3"
}
Baucal, A., Pavlović-Babić, D.,& Jošić, S.. (2018). Dialogical PISA: correct answers are all alike, every incorrect answer is incorrect in its own way. in European Journal of Psychology of Education
Springer, New York., 33(3), 467-487.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-018-0371-3
Baucal A, Pavlović-Babić D, Jošić S. Dialogical PISA: correct answers are all alike, every incorrect answer is incorrect in its own way. in European Journal of Psychology of Education. 2018;33(3):467-487.
doi:10.1007/s10212-018-0371-3 .
Baucal, Aleksandar, Pavlović-Babić, Dragica, Jošić, Smiljana, "Dialogical PISA: correct answers are all alike, every incorrect answer is incorrect in its own way" in European Journal of Psychology of Education, 33, no. 3 (2018):467-487,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-018-0371-3 . .
4
4
4

The role of asymmetrical interaction in the assessment of nonverbal abilities of children from the Drop-in center

Nedić, Jelena; Jošić, Smiljana; Baucal, Aleksandar

(Univerzitet u Beogradu - Učiteljski fakultet, Beograd, 2015)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Nedić, Jelena
AU  - Jošić, Smiljana
AU  - Baucal, Aleksandar
PY  - 2015
UR  - http://ipir.ipisr.org.rs/handle/123456789/248
AB  - The aim of this article is to show how a differently organized testing procedure can lead to a better understanding of intellectual capacity in children who live or work in the streets. The study presented in it tried to answer the following questions: 1) Does the achievement of children from the Drop-in center improve significantly on a nonverbal intelligence test when solved together with the experimenter? 2) Which type of scaffolding is most effective for children's task solving - affective-motivational, visual cognitive or verbal cognitive? 3) Which features of the asymmetric interactions enable children to find a solution to the tasks that they previously failed to solve? The sample consisted of 30 children from the Belgrade Drop-in center. Initially, the Kohs block design test was administered independently to children, and if they failed to solve it, the experimenter would provide scaffolding gradually, as listed above. The results showed that the children's achievement was very low when doing the test independently, but improved significantly when solving the tasks in interaction. According to cluster analysis four groups of children were identified which served as basis for the qualitative analysis. The conversational analysis between the children and the experimenter showed what proved to be the most significant difference between the groups, which is the function of affective-motivational help with task solving. It also demonstrated that the affective-motivational aid was a part of every successful interaction, but usually needed to be combined with its cognitive variants. As these results suggest, the standardized testing procedures need to be adapted so as to make sure that the children understand the demands of the tasks and that they are motivated and supported to reach the goal of the interaction. Only then can we obtain more valid information about the cognitive capacities of the children from the Drop-in center.
AB  - Kognitivna procena dece iz marginalizovanih sredina često je otežana zbog kulturoloških razlika koje se javljaju između normiranog i ispitivanog uzorka, zatim zbog prepreka koje nosi nizak socioekonomski status ispitivane dece, njihova edukativna depriviranost, ali i jezičkih barijera koje se javljaju prilikom testiranja. Upravo radi potrebe da se poveća informativnost kognitivnih procena i kod dece iz marginalizovanih sredina, razvilo se dinamičko procenjivanje, koje podrazumeva dobijanje informacija o aktuelnom, ali i o potencijalnom postignuću deteta. U ovom istraživanju želeli smo da bolje razumemo intelektualne kapacitete i specifičnosti korisnika beogradskog Svratišta za decu koja žive ili rade na ulici. Konkretno, cilj istraživanja bio je usmeren ka traženju odgovora na sledeća pitanja: 1) Da li se postignuće dece iz Svratišta na neverbalnom testu inteligencije značajno povećava kada ga rešavaju u asimetričnoj interakciji sa ispitivačem; 2) Koja vrsta pomoći je najčešće bila potrebna deci da urade zadatke koje nisu mogli samostalno - afektivno-motivaciona pomoć, vizuelna ili verbalna varijanta kognitivne pomoći; 3) Na koji način su deca u okviru datih pomoći došla do rešenja za koja prethodno nisu imala neophodne kognitivne strukture ili nisu uspela da ih upotrebe da bi došla do rešenja? U istraživanju je učestvovalo tridesetoro dece, korisnika Svratišta za decu koji žive u neformalnim naseljima, potiču iz mnogočlanih, ekstremno siromašnih porodica i izjašnjavaju se kao pripadnici romske zajednice. Najveći broj njih odlikuje vaspitno-edukativna depriviranost. Neverbalne kognitivne sposobnosti dece merene su testom Kosove kocke - suptestom u REVISK testu. Zadatak svakog deteta bio je da prvo pokuša samostalno da sklopi kocke i tek u slučaju neuspeha ispitivač je pružao prvo afektivno-motivacionu pomoć - sugerisao je detetu da razmisli ponovo i hrabrio ga time da on veruje da dete sigurno može da reši taj zadatak. Ukoliko uz ovaj nivo pomoći dete ne bi uspelo da reši zadatak, ispitivač je prelazio na prvi korak kognitivnog nivoa pomoći (vizuelna kognitivna pomoć), u kom se detetu davao model sa iscrtanim granicama kocaka. Ako ni uz ovaj nivo pomoći dete ne bi uspelo da reši zadatak, ispitivač je prelazio na drugi korak kognitivnog nivoa pomoći, koji je obuhvatao verbalno predstavljanje strategije koja je prethodno vizuelno sugerisana. Nakon ovog nivoa pomoći ispitivač je prelazio na sledeći zadatak koji dete nije uspešno rešilo u samostalnom pokušaju. Sva ispitivanja su snimana video-kamerom, uz prethodno odobrenje svakog deteta i saglasnost roditelja. Dobijeni rezultati pokazuju da su u okviru samostalnog rešavanja deca postizala značajno niže skorove u odnosu na norme koje su nastale na osnovu standardizacije instrumenta u opštoj populaciji. Ovaj nalaz je očekivan, s obzirom na to da su postignuća dece procenjivana na osnovu normativne grupe koja nije referentna za ispitivanu populaciju. Međutim, ispitivana deca su u asimetričnoj interakciji pokazala značajno napredovanje. Na osnovu dobijenih kvantitativnih podataka nismo bili u mogućnosti da izdvojimo jednu pomoć koja je najviše doprinela napretku, ali nam je u tome pomogla kvalitativna analiza interakcija ispitivača i dece. Kao polazna osnova za kvalitativnu analizu poslužila nam je klaster analiza, kojom su izdvojene četiri grupe dece. Ova analiza je pokazala da je afektivno-motivaciona pomoć bila sastavni deo svake uspešne interakcije, s tim što su se klasteri razlikovali prema tome koju je funkciju imala afektivno-motivaciona pomoć pri rešavanju testa u asimetričnoj interakciji. Dobijeni rezultati sugerišu da je za dobijanje tačnije informacije o kognitivnim kapacitetima dece Svratišta neophodno napustiti okvire standardne testovne procedure kako bi im bila obezbeđena mogućnost za bolje razumevanje zahteva koji su pred njima, kao i motivacija i podrška neophodni za postizanje cilja interakcije.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Učiteljski fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Inovacije u nastavi - časopis za savremenu nastavu
T1  - The role of asymmetrical interaction in the assessment of nonverbal abilities of children from the Drop-in center
T1  - Uloga asimetrične interakcije u proceni neverbalnih sposobnosti dece iz Svratišta
EP  - 206
IS  - 3
SP  - 189
VL  - 28
DO  - 10.5937/inovacije1503189N
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Nedić, Jelena and Jošić, Smiljana and Baucal, Aleksandar",
year = "2015",
abstract = "The aim of this article is to show how a differently organized testing procedure can lead to a better understanding of intellectual capacity in children who live or work in the streets. The study presented in it tried to answer the following questions: 1) Does the achievement of children from the Drop-in center improve significantly on a nonverbal intelligence test when solved together with the experimenter? 2) Which type of scaffolding is most effective for children's task solving - affective-motivational, visual cognitive or verbal cognitive? 3) Which features of the asymmetric interactions enable children to find a solution to the tasks that they previously failed to solve? The sample consisted of 30 children from the Belgrade Drop-in center. Initially, the Kohs block design test was administered independently to children, and if they failed to solve it, the experimenter would provide scaffolding gradually, as listed above. The results showed that the children's achievement was very low when doing the test independently, but improved significantly when solving the tasks in interaction. According to cluster analysis four groups of children were identified which served as basis for the qualitative analysis. The conversational analysis between the children and the experimenter showed what proved to be the most significant difference between the groups, which is the function of affective-motivational help with task solving. It also demonstrated that the affective-motivational aid was a part of every successful interaction, but usually needed to be combined with its cognitive variants. As these results suggest, the standardized testing procedures need to be adapted so as to make sure that the children understand the demands of the tasks and that they are motivated and supported to reach the goal of the interaction. Only then can we obtain more valid information about the cognitive capacities of the children from the Drop-in center., Kognitivna procena dece iz marginalizovanih sredina često je otežana zbog kulturoloških razlika koje se javljaju između normiranog i ispitivanog uzorka, zatim zbog prepreka koje nosi nizak socioekonomski status ispitivane dece, njihova edukativna depriviranost, ali i jezičkih barijera koje se javljaju prilikom testiranja. Upravo radi potrebe da se poveća informativnost kognitivnih procena i kod dece iz marginalizovanih sredina, razvilo se dinamičko procenjivanje, koje podrazumeva dobijanje informacija o aktuelnom, ali i o potencijalnom postignuću deteta. U ovom istraživanju želeli smo da bolje razumemo intelektualne kapacitete i specifičnosti korisnika beogradskog Svratišta za decu koja žive ili rade na ulici. Konkretno, cilj istraživanja bio je usmeren ka traženju odgovora na sledeća pitanja: 1) Da li se postignuće dece iz Svratišta na neverbalnom testu inteligencije značajno povećava kada ga rešavaju u asimetričnoj interakciji sa ispitivačem; 2) Koja vrsta pomoći je najčešće bila potrebna deci da urade zadatke koje nisu mogli samostalno - afektivno-motivaciona pomoć, vizuelna ili verbalna varijanta kognitivne pomoći; 3) Na koji način su deca u okviru datih pomoći došla do rešenja za koja prethodno nisu imala neophodne kognitivne strukture ili nisu uspela da ih upotrebe da bi došla do rešenja? U istraživanju je učestvovalo tridesetoro dece, korisnika Svratišta za decu koji žive u neformalnim naseljima, potiču iz mnogočlanih, ekstremno siromašnih porodica i izjašnjavaju se kao pripadnici romske zajednice. Najveći broj njih odlikuje vaspitno-edukativna depriviranost. Neverbalne kognitivne sposobnosti dece merene su testom Kosove kocke - suptestom u REVISK testu. Zadatak svakog deteta bio je da prvo pokuša samostalno da sklopi kocke i tek u slučaju neuspeha ispitivač je pružao prvo afektivno-motivacionu pomoć - sugerisao je detetu da razmisli ponovo i hrabrio ga time da on veruje da dete sigurno može da reši taj zadatak. Ukoliko uz ovaj nivo pomoći dete ne bi uspelo da reši zadatak, ispitivač je prelazio na prvi korak kognitivnog nivoa pomoći (vizuelna kognitivna pomoć), u kom se detetu davao model sa iscrtanim granicama kocaka. Ako ni uz ovaj nivo pomoći dete ne bi uspelo da reši zadatak, ispitivač je prelazio na drugi korak kognitivnog nivoa pomoći, koji je obuhvatao verbalno predstavljanje strategije koja je prethodno vizuelno sugerisana. Nakon ovog nivoa pomoći ispitivač je prelazio na sledeći zadatak koji dete nije uspešno rešilo u samostalnom pokušaju. Sva ispitivanja su snimana video-kamerom, uz prethodno odobrenje svakog deteta i saglasnost roditelja. Dobijeni rezultati pokazuju da su u okviru samostalnog rešavanja deca postizala značajno niže skorove u odnosu na norme koje su nastale na osnovu standardizacije instrumenta u opštoj populaciji. Ovaj nalaz je očekivan, s obzirom na to da su postignuća dece procenjivana na osnovu normativne grupe koja nije referentna za ispitivanu populaciju. Međutim, ispitivana deca su u asimetričnoj interakciji pokazala značajno napredovanje. Na osnovu dobijenih kvantitativnih podataka nismo bili u mogućnosti da izdvojimo jednu pomoć koja je najviše doprinela napretku, ali nam je u tome pomogla kvalitativna analiza interakcija ispitivača i dece. Kao polazna osnova za kvalitativnu analizu poslužila nam je klaster analiza, kojom su izdvojene četiri grupe dece. Ova analiza je pokazala da je afektivno-motivaciona pomoć bila sastavni deo svake uspešne interakcije, s tim što su se klasteri razlikovali prema tome koju je funkciju imala afektivno-motivaciona pomoć pri rešavanju testa u asimetričnoj interakciji. Dobijeni rezultati sugerišu da je za dobijanje tačnije informacije o kognitivnim kapacitetima dece Svratišta neophodno napustiti okvire standardne testovne procedure kako bi im bila obezbeđena mogućnost za bolje razumevanje zahteva koji su pred njima, kao i motivacija i podrška neophodni za postizanje cilja interakcije.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Učiteljski fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Inovacije u nastavi - časopis za savremenu nastavu",
title = "The role of asymmetrical interaction in the assessment of nonverbal abilities of children from the Drop-in center, Uloga asimetrične interakcije u proceni neverbalnih sposobnosti dece iz Svratišta",
pages = "206-189",
number = "3",
volume = "28",
doi = "10.5937/inovacije1503189N"
}
Nedić, J., Jošić, S.,& Baucal, A.. (2015). The role of asymmetrical interaction in the assessment of nonverbal abilities of children from the Drop-in center. in Inovacije u nastavi - časopis za savremenu nastavu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Učiteljski fakultet, Beograd., 28(3), 189-206.
https://doi.org/10.5937/inovacije1503189N
Nedić J, Jošić S, Baucal A. The role of asymmetrical interaction in the assessment of nonverbal abilities of children from the Drop-in center. in Inovacije u nastavi - časopis za savremenu nastavu. 2015;28(3):189-206.
doi:10.5937/inovacije1503189N .
Nedić, Jelena, Jošić, Smiljana, Baucal, Aleksandar, "The role of asymmetrical interaction in the assessment of nonverbal abilities of children from the Drop-in center" in Inovacije u nastavi - časopis za savremenu nastavu, 28, no. 3 (2015):189-206,
https://doi.org/10.5937/inovacije1503189N . .
5

Peer interaction influence on decision-making in ten-year-old children

Jošić, Smiljana; Buđevac, Nevena; Baucal, Aleksandar

(Univerzitet u Beogradu - Filozofski fakultet - Institut za psihologiju, Beograd, 2012)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Jošić, Smiljana
AU  - Buđevac, Nevena
AU  - Baucal, Aleksandar
PY  - 2012
UR  - http://ipir.ipisr.org.rs/handle/123456789/188
AB  - The aim of this study was to investigate the changes in decision-making of ten-year old children under the influence of peer interaction. We tried to determine whether there were differences in the decision-making process when children made their decisions in a group, as opposed to the situation when they decided individually. In the first phase of the study (which included individual decision-making), 139 fourth-graders were tested. Based on their responses we formed 10 triads in the experimental group. The control group consisted of 31 children with the response structure equivalent to the initial response structure in the experimental group. In the second phase, children in the control group once again decided individually, while children in the experimental group made a group decision. We found that subjects in the control group retained their previous decisions, while children in the experimental group changed their initial decisions under the influence of peers, so that their decisions became less risky. This finding may be ascribed to the context in which the research was conducted (school), but also to the content of the task used. Qualitative analysis of social interaction enabled us to understand the dynamics of group decision-making. We found several mechanisms that explain how children change their initial decision in the triad (reference to the opinion of the authority, conversational passivity, majority rule, etc.), and how they retain their decision (conversational activity and argumentation).
AB  - Ovo istraživanje bilo je usmereno na ispitivanje promena u procesu donošenja odluka koje pod uticajem vršnjačke interakcije donose desetogodišnjaci. Pokušali smo da utvrdimo da li deca u grupi donose odluke drugačije nego kada iste odluke donose samostalno. U prvoj fazi istraživanja, koja je podrazumevala individualno donošenje odluka, testirano je 139 učenika četvrtog razreda. Na osnovu njihovih odgovora formirano je 10 trijada za eksperimentalnu grupu. Kontrolnu grupu činilo je 31 dete sa istom strukturom početnih odgovora kao u eksperimentalnoj grupi. U drugoj fazi su deca iz kontrolne grupe još jednom samostalno odlučivala, dok su deca u eksperimentalnoj grupi donosila grupne odluke. Nalazi su pokazali da su ispitanici iz kontrolne grupe zadržavali svoje prethodne odluke, dok su ih deca u eksperimentalnoj grupi menjala pod uticajem vršnjaka, tako da su u grupi donosili manje rizične odluke. Ovaj nalaz može biti posledica uticaja konteksta u kojem je vršeno istraživanje (škola), ali i sadržaja korišćenog zadatka. Kvalitativna analiza socijalne interakcije pomogla nam je da razumemo tok grupnog donošenja odluka. Pronašli smo nekoliko mehanizama koji govore o tome kako deca menjaju svoju prvobitnu odluku u trijadi (pozivanje na mišljenje autoriteta, konverzaciona pasivnost, pravilo većine itd.), kao i o tome kako uspevaju da zadrže svoju odluku (konverzaciona aktivnost i argumentacija).
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Filozofski fakultet - Institut za psihologiju, Beograd
T2  - Psihološka istraživanja
T1  - Peer interaction influence on decision-making in ten-year-old children
T1  - Uloga vršnjačke interakcije u donošenju odluka desetogodišnjaka
EP  - 207
IS  - 2
SP  - 185
VL  - 15
DO  - 10.5937/PsIstra1202185J
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Jošić, Smiljana and Buđevac, Nevena and Baucal, Aleksandar",
year = "2012",
abstract = "The aim of this study was to investigate the changes in decision-making of ten-year old children under the influence of peer interaction. We tried to determine whether there were differences in the decision-making process when children made their decisions in a group, as opposed to the situation when they decided individually. In the first phase of the study (which included individual decision-making), 139 fourth-graders were tested. Based on their responses we formed 10 triads in the experimental group. The control group consisted of 31 children with the response structure equivalent to the initial response structure in the experimental group. In the second phase, children in the control group once again decided individually, while children in the experimental group made a group decision. We found that subjects in the control group retained their previous decisions, while children in the experimental group changed their initial decisions under the influence of peers, so that their decisions became less risky. This finding may be ascribed to the context in which the research was conducted (school), but also to the content of the task used. Qualitative analysis of social interaction enabled us to understand the dynamics of group decision-making. We found several mechanisms that explain how children change their initial decision in the triad (reference to the opinion of the authority, conversational passivity, majority rule, etc.), and how they retain their decision (conversational activity and argumentation)., Ovo istraživanje bilo je usmereno na ispitivanje promena u procesu donošenja odluka koje pod uticajem vršnjačke interakcije donose desetogodišnjaci. Pokušali smo da utvrdimo da li deca u grupi donose odluke drugačije nego kada iste odluke donose samostalno. U prvoj fazi istraživanja, koja je podrazumevala individualno donošenje odluka, testirano je 139 učenika četvrtog razreda. Na osnovu njihovih odgovora formirano je 10 trijada za eksperimentalnu grupu. Kontrolnu grupu činilo je 31 dete sa istom strukturom početnih odgovora kao u eksperimentalnoj grupi. U drugoj fazi su deca iz kontrolne grupe još jednom samostalno odlučivala, dok su deca u eksperimentalnoj grupi donosila grupne odluke. Nalazi su pokazali da su ispitanici iz kontrolne grupe zadržavali svoje prethodne odluke, dok su ih deca u eksperimentalnoj grupi menjala pod uticajem vršnjaka, tako da su u grupi donosili manje rizične odluke. Ovaj nalaz može biti posledica uticaja konteksta u kojem je vršeno istraživanje (škola), ali i sadržaja korišćenog zadatka. Kvalitativna analiza socijalne interakcije pomogla nam je da razumemo tok grupnog donošenja odluka. Pronašli smo nekoliko mehanizama koji govore o tome kako deca menjaju svoju prvobitnu odluku u trijadi (pozivanje na mišljenje autoriteta, konverzaciona pasivnost, pravilo većine itd.), kao i o tome kako uspevaju da zadrže svoju odluku (konverzaciona aktivnost i argumentacija).",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Filozofski fakultet - Institut za psihologiju, Beograd",
journal = "Psihološka istraživanja",
title = "Peer interaction influence on decision-making in ten-year-old children, Uloga vršnjačke interakcije u donošenju odluka desetogodišnjaka",
pages = "207-185",
number = "2",
volume = "15",
doi = "10.5937/PsIstra1202185J"
}
Jošić, S., Buđevac, N.,& Baucal, A.. (2012). Peer interaction influence on decision-making in ten-year-old children. in Psihološka istraživanja
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Filozofski fakultet - Institut za psihologiju, Beograd., 15(2), 185-207.
https://doi.org/10.5937/PsIstra1202185J
Jošić S, Buđevac N, Baucal A. Peer interaction influence on decision-making in ten-year-old children. in Psihološka istraživanja. 2012;15(2):185-207.
doi:10.5937/PsIstra1202185J .
Jošić, Smiljana, Buđevac, Nevena, Baucal, Aleksandar, "Peer interaction influence on decision-making in ten-year-old children" in Psihološka istraživanja, 15, no. 2 (2012):185-207,
https://doi.org/10.5937/PsIstra1202185J . .