IPIR - Repository of the Institute for Educational Research
Institute for Educational Research
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   IPIR
  • IPI
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
  • View Item
  •   IPIR
  • IPI
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Bridging the Gap: The Affective Dimension of Learning Outcomes in Environmental Primary and Secondary Education

Thumbnail
2023
Bridging_the_Gap_The_Affective_Dimension_of_Learning_Outcomes_in_Environmental_Primary_and_Secondary_Education_2023.pdf (836.1Kb)
Authors
Orlović Lovren, Violeta
Marušić Jablanović, Milica
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
There is growing evidence of the power of the affective dimensions for pro-environmental behavior, as well as of existing gaps between the dimensions of learning outcomes in recent environmental education literature. Based on the need to address that gap, this article explores the integration of the cognitive (ecological knowledge and cognitive skills), the affective and the behavioral domain in the learning outcomes of subjects related to the environment within Serbian elementary and general secondary education. This analysis was performed on the second cycle of the elementary school curricula and the general secondary education curricula for the following compulsory subjects: biology, chemistry and geography. It uses the holistic framework of EE goals, as defined by the Tbilisi Declaration as well as the concept of environmental literacy, as defined by the authors of the National Environmental Literacy Assessment used in the US, which distinguish four components of environmental lite...racy: ecological knowledge, cognitive skills, environmental affects and pro-environmental behavior. The results clearly show the dominance of the cognitive when compared with the affective and behavioral dimensions in both primary and secondary education. The focus of education on measurable outcomes offers firm structure for planning and evaluation, but underestimates the importance of preferences, values, enjoyment and does not facilitate rewarding the main source of pro-environmental behavior. Starting from the holistic and whole school approach to environmental education, the authors re-emphasize the need to bridge the existing gap and to provide policy support to teachers in developing their own as well as students’ environmental engagement and resilience.

Keywords:
affective dimension / environmental education / learning outcomes / Serbia / teachers
Source:
Sustainability, 2023, 15, 8, 6370-
Funding / projects:
  • Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, Republic of Serbia, Grant no. 200018 (Institute for Educational Research, Belgrade) (RS-200018)

DOI: 10.3390/su15086370

ISBN: 2071-1050

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/6370
http://ipir.ipisr.org.rs/handle/123456789/934
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
Institution/Community
IPI
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Orlović Lovren, Violeta
AU  - Marušić Jablanović, Milica
PY  - 2023
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/6370
UR  - http://ipir.ipisr.org.rs/handle/123456789/934
AB  - There is growing evidence of the power of the affective dimensions for pro-environmental behavior, as well as of existing gaps between the dimensions of learning outcomes in recent environmental education literature. Based on the need to address that gap, this article explores the integration of the cognitive (ecological knowledge and cognitive skills), the affective and the behavioral domain in the learning outcomes of subjects related to the environment within Serbian elementary and general secondary education. This analysis was performed on the second cycle of the elementary school curricula and the general secondary education curricula for the following compulsory subjects: biology, chemistry and geography. It uses the holistic framework of EE goals, as defined by the Tbilisi Declaration as well as the concept of environmental literacy, as defined by the authors of the National Environmental Literacy Assessment used in the US, which distinguish four components of environmental literacy: ecological knowledge, cognitive skills, environmental affects and pro-environmental behavior. The results clearly show the dominance of the cognitive when compared with the affective and behavioral dimensions in both primary and secondary education. The focus of education on measurable outcomes offers firm structure for planning and evaluation, but underestimates the importance of preferences, values, enjoyment and does not facilitate rewarding the main source of pro-environmental behavior. Starting from the holistic and whole school approach to environmental education, the authors re-emphasize the need to bridge the existing gap and to provide policy support to teachers in developing their own as well as students’ environmental engagement and resilience.
T2  - Sustainability
T2  - Sustainability
T1  - Bridging the Gap: The Affective Dimension of Learning Outcomes in Environmental Primary and Secondary Education
IS  - 8
SP  - 6370
VL  - 15
DO  - 10.3390/su15086370
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Orlović Lovren, Violeta and Marušić Jablanović, Milica",
year = "2023",
abstract = "There is growing evidence of the power of the affective dimensions for pro-environmental behavior, as well as of existing gaps between the dimensions of learning outcomes in recent environmental education literature. Based on the need to address that gap, this article explores the integration of the cognitive (ecological knowledge and cognitive skills), the affective and the behavioral domain in the learning outcomes of subjects related to the environment within Serbian elementary and general secondary education. This analysis was performed on the second cycle of the elementary school curricula and the general secondary education curricula for the following compulsory subjects: biology, chemistry and geography. It uses the holistic framework of EE goals, as defined by the Tbilisi Declaration as well as the concept of environmental literacy, as defined by the authors of the National Environmental Literacy Assessment used in the US, which distinguish four components of environmental literacy: ecological knowledge, cognitive skills, environmental affects and pro-environmental behavior. The results clearly show the dominance of the cognitive when compared with the affective and behavioral dimensions in both primary and secondary education. The focus of education on measurable outcomes offers firm structure for planning and evaluation, but underestimates the importance of preferences, values, enjoyment and does not facilitate rewarding the main source of pro-environmental behavior. Starting from the holistic and whole school approach to environmental education, the authors re-emphasize the need to bridge the existing gap and to provide policy support to teachers in developing their own as well as students’ environmental engagement and resilience.",
journal = "Sustainability, Sustainability",
title = "Bridging the Gap: The Affective Dimension of Learning Outcomes in Environmental Primary and Secondary Education",
number = "8",
pages = "6370",
volume = "15",
doi = "10.3390/su15086370"
}
Orlović Lovren, V.,& Marušić Jablanović, M.. (2023). Bridging the Gap: The Affective Dimension of Learning Outcomes in Environmental Primary and Secondary Education. in Sustainability, 15(8), 6370.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086370
Orlović Lovren V, Marušić Jablanović M. Bridging the Gap: The Affective Dimension of Learning Outcomes in Environmental Primary and Secondary Education. in Sustainability. 2023;15(8):6370.
doi:10.3390/su15086370 .
Orlović Lovren, Violeta, Marušić Jablanović, Milica, "Bridging the Gap: The Affective Dimension of Learning Outcomes in Environmental Primary and Secondary Education" in Sustainability, 15, no. 8 (2023):6370,
https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086370 . .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About IPIR | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About IPIR | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB