Veinović, Zorica

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
87386b60-e0fb-465f-8b5c-555651255f37
  • Veinović, Zorica (3)
  • Veinović, Zorica P. (1)
Projects

Author's Bibliography

Environmental Literacy Development and the Role of Environmental Elective Elementary School Course: Case of Serbian Education

Blagdanić, Sanja; Marušić Jablanović, Milica; Stanišić, Jelena; Veinović, Zorica; Savić, Slađana

(Germany : European Educational Research Association, 2024)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Blagdanić, Sanja
AU  - Marušić Jablanović, Milica
AU  - Stanišić, Jelena
AU  - Veinović, Zorica
AU  - Savić, Slađana
PY  - 2024
UR  - https://eera-ecer.de/ecer-programmes/conference/29/contribution/58742
UR  - http://ipir.ipisr.org.rs/handle/123456789/1131
AB  - Contribution
The environmental performance of the Republic of Serbia is unsatisfactory, and the consequences of environmental degradation reflect on the population's health and quality of life. Taking into account that children and young people are future decision-makers, it is necessary to provide them with an opportunity to acquire knowledge, skills, and develop attitudes that will help them to act in environmentally responsible way, both locally and globally. This paper is part of the ELIPS project which aims to investigate environmental literacy (EL) and the environmental identity among the 7th grade students in Serbia. EL is operationalized comprehensively, encompassing four components: (1) knowledge, (2) affect, (3) cognitive skills, and (4) behavior (Marcinkowski, 1991, 2004; McBeth et al., 2008; Wilke, 1995). The testing of EL among elementary school students was conducted in several countries around the world applying an international instrument for determining the level of environmental literacy, the Middle School Environmental Literacy Survey (MSELS) (McBeth et al., 2008). In the USA, EL was tested on a sample of sixth-graders (age 11-12) and the eighth-graders (age 13-14). The total EL score on a total sample was 144.83 (out of 240) (McBeth et al., 2008). As far as separate EL components are concerned, the students from the USA achieved the following results: knowledge – 40.34; affect – 38.05; cognitive skills – 25.56, and 36.84 for behavior. Students from Thessaloniki (Greece), age12-15, had a total score of 123.31 (Nastoulas et al., 2017). The scores for EL components for the students from Thessaloniki were: knowledge – 35.18; affect – 35.43; cognitive skills – 17.2, and 36.5 for behavior.
In the context of local and global environmental issues, as well as the obligations of Serbia stemming from signing international (UN) documents related to the environment and environmental education, the early 21st century marked the beginning of the implementation of the goals of this concept in the educational system. Regarding elementary education, which is divided into two cycles in Serbia (the first cycle – students of age 7-10; the second cycle – students of age 11-15), these goals were implemented in some compulsory school subjects from the field of science (biology, chemistry, etc.), and in the curricula of some elective subjects. This was the case with the elective subject Guardians of Nature (GN) which was introduced in 2004. It was in the list of electives in the first six grades until 2018, when its status was formally changed and it became an optional activity. Nevertheless, its status essentially remained the same, provided that it is offered by a school which, in turn, is obligated to offer three elective subjects/optional activities in every grade and students are free to choose GN according to their interests. The subject/activity GN, though not compulsory for all students, is significant for our research because its goals/outcomes are focused on developing all EL components and the recommended contents encompass all topics related to the environment and the role of people in its degradation and preservation. In some research, the curricula are linked to the EL level of students. For example, the positive effects of the elective subjects pertaining to environmental education on the EL levels of students in the USA (North Carolina), age 11-14, were identified, especially in the domain of cognitive skills (Stevenson et al., 2013). Taking everything above-mentioned into account, we decided to investigate, apart from the EL of students of age 14, whether there is a connection between attending GN classes and the level of the EL components acquired.

Method
The researchers applied a survey methodology using the MSELS questionnaire (McBeth et al., 2008). The MSELS measures four EL components, with maximal score 60 per each, which means that the total number of the score points was maximum 240. The instrument contains the basic environmental knowledge items (N=17). The tasks related to cognitive skills (N=17) consist of texts presenting environmental problems in real-life situations. Students are expected to identify and analyze the problems given in the texts and then choose the best ecological strategies as solutions to the problem. The items measuring affect (N=25) refer to environmental sensitivity, students’ verbal commitment, and their intentions to preserve the environment. Pro-environmental behavior was measured in the tasks investigating students’ genuine commitment to protecting the environment in everyday situations (N=12). The instrument also includes the questions related to the socio-demographic characteristics of the students (age, gender, parents' level of education), and the electives the students have attended. The applicability of the MSELS (for the population of the 14-year-old students) in Serbian context was confirmed in a pilot study (Marušić Jablanović et al., 2022). The testing of the EL level of Serbian students was conducted on students of age 13-14 (N=877). The sample is stratified according to the regions and the urbanization level of the settlements in Serbia. The collected data were processed by using descriptive statistical procedures (for measuring students’ achievement on MSELS questionnaire, in total, and per EL component). The scores of students who attended the GN course from grades 1-4 were compared to the scores of students who have attended this course from the 5th grade, using an Independent-samples T test. The same test was applied for comparison of students who have not attended the course and those who have attended it since the 1st grade until now.

Expected Outcomes
The results indicate that the total average score of students is 147.93. The average scores for EL components are 37.85 for knowledge, 44.11 for affect, 25.97 for cognitive skills, and 40.01 for behavior. The students from Serbia obtained higher scores than American (McBeth et al.) and Greek students (Nastoulas et al., 2017), both in total EL score and in components affect and behavior. The students who attended GN elective subject/optional activity in both educational cycles have a more pronounced affect relative to students who did not attend the course (Sig = .009; df= 370; t= 2.636). The students who attended the course from grades 1-4 performed better on cognitive skills, compared to those attending it from the 5th grade (t=2.026, Sig=.043). Given that in Serbian educational practice teachers influence children’s subject/activity selection (Cvjetićanin et al., 2011), we may assume that GN contributed to students increased interest in nature, their decisiveness to change behavior and become more pro-active. The results speak in favor of the GN course, in terms of attitudes towards the environment, as well as in favor of the practice of teachers teaching grades 1-4. Nonetheless, the fact that students who attended this course did not have higher scores in other EL components raises concern. The results show that there is potential for improving the levels of EL in all domains, especially the cognitive skills domain. Although the elective subject/optional activity GN positively impacts the development of some EL components among children from Serbia, there are still indicators that the implementation of this course needs to be improved. In addition, some possible ways of developing students’ EL include development of teachers’ environmental competencies, enrichment of compulsory subjects with environmental contents and activities, as well as greater support of school for outdoor learning, cooperation with local community.

References
Cvjetićanin, S., Segedinac, M., & Segedinac, M. (2011). Problems of teachers related to teaching optional science subjects in elementary schools in Serbia. Croatian Journal of Education, 13(2), 184-216. McBeth, B., Hungerford, H., Marcinkowski, T., Volk, T. & Meyers, R. (2008). National Environmental Literacy Assessment Project: Year 1, National Baseline Study of Middle Grades Students Final Research Report (192). National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Retrieved January 10, 2022. from https://www.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/legacy/document/2019/Jun/Final_NELA_minus_MSELS_8-12-08.pdf Marcinkowski, T. (1991). The relationship between environmental literacy and responsible environmental behavior in environmental education. Methods and Techniques for Evaluating Environmental Education. UNESCO. Marcinkowski, T. (2004). Using a Logic Model to Review and Analyze an Environmental Education Program. In Volk, T. (Ed.), NAAEE Monograph Series, Volume 1. NAAEE. Marušić Jablanović, M., Stanišić, J. & Savić, S. (2022). Еnvironmental Literacy of Students in Belgrade Schools: Results of a Pilot Research. Teaching Innovations, 35(4), 28–46. DOI: 10.5937/inovacije2204028M Nastoulas, I., Marini, K. & Skanavis, C. (2017). Middle school students’ environmental literacy assessment in Thessaloniki, Greece. In Anwar, S., El Sergany, M. & Ankit, A. (Eds.). Health and Environment Conference Proceedings (198–209). Dubai: Hamdan Bin Mohammed Smart University. Retrieved January 10, 2022. from https://www.hbmsu.ac.ae/downloads/massmail/2017/august/HBMSU_Innovation_Arabia_Health_and_ Environment_Conference_Proceedings_2017.pdf#page=203 Pravilnik o nastavnom planu i programu za prvi i drugi razred osnovnog obrazovanja i vaspitanja [The Rulebook on the Curriculum for the first and second grades of elementary school] (2004). Službeni glasnik RS - Prosvetni glasnik, br. 10. Pravilnik o dopunama Pravilnika o planu nastave i učenja za prvi ciklus osnovnog obrazovanja i vaspitanja [The Rulebook on amendments to the Rulebook on teaching and learning plan for the first cycle of elementary school] (2018). Službeni glasnik RS - Prosvetni glasnik, br. 15. Pravilnik o planu i programu nastave i učenja za peti i šesti razred osnovnog obrazovanja i vaspitanja [The Rulebook on teaching and learning plan for the fifth and sixth grades of elementary school] (2018). Službeni glasnik RS - Prosvetni glasnik, br. 15. Stevenson, K. T., Peterson, M. N., Bondell, H. D., Mertig, A. G. & Moore, S. E. (2013). Environmental, Institutional, and Demographic Predictors of Environmental Literacy among Middle School Children. PLOS ONE, 8 (3), e59519. Retrieved Jun 22, 2022. from https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059519 Wilke, R. (Ed.). (1995). Environmental Education Literacy/Needs Assessment Project: Assessing Environmental Literacy of Students and Environmental Education Needs of Teachers; Final Report for 1993–1995 (30–76). (Report to NCEET/University of Michigan under U.S. EPA Grant #NT901935-01-2). University of Wisconsin – Stevens Point.
PB  - Germany : European Educational Research Association
C3  - ECER
T1  - Environmental Literacy Development and the Role of Environmental Elective Elementary School Course: Case of Serbian Education
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ipir_1131
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Blagdanić, Sanja and Marušić Jablanović, Milica and Stanišić, Jelena and Veinović, Zorica and Savić, Slađana",
year = "2024",
abstract = "Contribution
The environmental performance of the Republic of Serbia is unsatisfactory, and the consequences of environmental degradation reflect on the population's health and quality of life. Taking into account that children and young people are future decision-makers, it is necessary to provide them with an opportunity to acquire knowledge, skills, and develop attitudes that will help them to act in environmentally responsible way, both locally and globally. This paper is part of the ELIPS project which aims to investigate environmental literacy (EL) and the environmental identity among the 7th grade students in Serbia. EL is operationalized comprehensively, encompassing four components: (1) knowledge, (2) affect, (3) cognitive skills, and (4) behavior (Marcinkowski, 1991, 2004; McBeth et al., 2008; Wilke, 1995). The testing of EL among elementary school students was conducted in several countries around the world applying an international instrument for determining the level of environmental literacy, the Middle School Environmental Literacy Survey (MSELS) (McBeth et al., 2008). In the USA, EL was tested on a sample of sixth-graders (age 11-12) and the eighth-graders (age 13-14). The total EL score on a total sample was 144.83 (out of 240) (McBeth et al., 2008). As far as separate EL components are concerned, the students from the USA achieved the following results: knowledge – 40.34; affect – 38.05; cognitive skills – 25.56, and 36.84 for behavior. Students from Thessaloniki (Greece), age12-15, had a total score of 123.31 (Nastoulas et al., 2017). The scores for EL components for the students from Thessaloniki were: knowledge – 35.18; affect – 35.43; cognitive skills – 17.2, and 36.5 for behavior.
In the context of local and global environmental issues, as well as the obligations of Serbia stemming from signing international (UN) documents related to the environment and environmental education, the early 21st century marked the beginning of the implementation of the goals of this concept in the educational system. Regarding elementary education, which is divided into two cycles in Serbia (the first cycle – students of age 7-10; the second cycle – students of age 11-15), these goals were implemented in some compulsory school subjects from the field of science (biology, chemistry, etc.), and in the curricula of some elective subjects. This was the case with the elective subject Guardians of Nature (GN) which was introduced in 2004. It was in the list of electives in the first six grades until 2018, when its status was formally changed and it became an optional activity. Nevertheless, its status essentially remained the same, provided that it is offered by a school which, in turn, is obligated to offer three elective subjects/optional activities in every grade and students are free to choose GN according to their interests. The subject/activity GN, though not compulsory for all students, is significant for our research because its goals/outcomes are focused on developing all EL components and the recommended contents encompass all topics related to the environment and the role of people in its degradation and preservation. In some research, the curricula are linked to the EL level of students. For example, the positive effects of the elective subjects pertaining to environmental education on the EL levels of students in the USA (North Carolina), age 11-14, were identified, especially in the domain of cognitive skills (Stevenson et al., 2013). Taking everything above-mentioned into account, we decided to investigate, apart from the EL of students of age 14, whether there is a connection between attending GN classes and the level of the EL components acquired.

Method
The researchers applied a survey methodology using the MSELS questionnaire (McBeth et al., 2008). The MSELS measures four EL components, with maximal score 60 per each, which means that the total number of the score points was maximum 240. The instrument contains the basic environmental knowledge items (N=17). The tasks related to cognitive skills (N=17) consist of texts presenting environmental problems in real-life situations. Students are expected to identify and analyze the problems given in the texts and then choose the best ecological strategies as solutions to the problem. The items measuring affect (N=25) refer to environmental sensitivity, students’ verbal commitment, and their intentions to preserve the environment. Pro-environmental behavior was measured in the tasks investigating students’ genuine commitment to protecting the environment in everyday situations (N=12). The instrument also includes the questions related to the socio-demographic characteristics of the students (age, gender, parents' level of education), and the electives the students have attended. The applicability of the MSELS (for the population of the 14-year-old students) in Serbian context was confirmed in a pilot study (Marušić Jablanović et al., 2022). The testing of the EL level of Serbian students was conducted on students of age 13-14 (N=877). The sample is stratified according to the regions and the urbanization level of the settlements in Serbia. The collected data were processed by using descriptive statistical procedures (for measuring students’ achievement on MSELS questionnaire, in total, and per EL component). The scores of students who attended the GN course from grades 1-4 were compared to the scores of students who have attended this course from the 5th grade, using an Independent-samples T test. The same test was applied for comparison of students who have not attended the course and those who have attended it since the 1st grade until now.

Expected Outcomes
The results indicate that the total average score of students is 147.93. The average scores for EL components are 37.85 for knowledge, 44.11 for affect, 25.97 for cognitive skills, and 40.01 for behavior. The students from Serbia obtained higher scores than American (McBeth et al.) and Greek students (Nastoulas et al., 2017), both in total EL score and in components affect and behavior. The students who attended GN elective subject/optional activity in both educational cycles have a more pronounced affect relative to students who did not attend the course (Sig = .009; df= 370; t= 2.636). The students who attended the course from grades 1-4 performed better on cognitive skills, compared to those attending it from the 5th grade (t=2.026, Sig=.043). Given that in Serbian educational practice teachers influence children’s subject/activity selection (Cvjetićanin et al., 2011), we may assume that GN contributed to students increased interest in nature, their decisiveness to change behavior and become more pro-active. The results speak in favor of the GN course, in terms of attitudes towards the environment, as well as in favor of the practice of teachers teaching grades 1-4. Nonetheless, the fact that students who attended this course did not have higher scores in other EL components raises concern. The results show that there is potential for improving the levels of EL in all domains, especially the cognitive skills domain. Although the elective subject/optional activity GN positively impacts the development of some EL components among children from Serbia, there are still indicators that the implementation of this course needs to be improved. In addition, some possible ways of developing students’ EL include development of teachers’ environmental competencies, enrichment of compulsory subjects with environmental contents and activities, as well as greater support of school for outdoor learning, cooperation with local community.

References
Cvjetićanin, S., Segedinac, M., & Segedinac, M. (2011). Problems of teachers related to teaching optional science subjects in elementary schools in Serbia. Croatian Journal of Education, 13(2), 184-216. McBeth, B., Hungerford, H., Marcinkowski, T., Volk, T. & Meyers, R. (2008). National Environmental Literacy Assessment Project: Year 1, National Baseline Study of Middle Grades Students Final Research Report (192). National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Retrieved January 10, 2022. from https://www.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/legacy/document/2019/Jun/Final_NELA_minus_MSELS_8-12-08.pdf Marcinkowski, T. (1991). The relationship between environmental literacy and responsible environmental behavior in environmental education. Methods and Techniques for Evaluating Environmental Education. UNESCO. Marcinkowski, T. (2004). Using a Logic Model to Review and Analyze an Environmental Education Program. In Volk, T. (Ed.), NAAEE Monograph Series, Volume 1. NAAEE. Marušić Jablanović, M., Stanišić, J. & Savić, S. (2022). Еnvironmental Literacy of Students in Belgrade Schools: Results of a Pilot Research. Teaching Innovations, 35(4), 28–46. DOI: 10.5937/inovacije2204028M Nastoulas, I., Marini, K. & Skanavis, C. (2017). Middle school students’ environmental literacy assessment in Thessaloniki, Greece. In Anwar, S., El Sergany, M. & Ankit, A. (Eds.). Health and Environment Conference Proceedings (198–209). Dubai: Hamdan Bin Mohammed Smart University. Retrieved January 10, 2022. from https://www.hbmsu.ac.ae/downloads/massmail/2017/august/HBMSU_Innovation_Arabia_Health_and_ Environment_Conference_Proceedings_2017.pdf#page=203 Pravilnik o nastavnom planu i programu za prvi i drugi razred osnovnog obrazovanja i vaspitanja [The Rulebook on the Curriculum for the first and second grades of elementary school] (2004). Službeni glasnik RS - Prosvetni glasnik, br. 10. Pravilnik o dopunama Pravilnika o planu nastave i učenja za prvi ciklus osnovnog obrazovanja i vaspitanja [The Rulebook on amendments to the Rulebook on teaching and learning plan for the first cycle of elementary school] (2018). Službeni glasnik RS - Prosvetni glasnik, br. 15. Pravilnik o planu i programu nastave i učenja za peti i šesti razred osnovnog obrazovanja i vaspitanja [The Rulebook on teaching and learning plan for the fifth and sixth grades of elementary school] (2018). Službeni glasnik RS - Prosvetni glasnik, br. 15. Stevenson, K. T., Peterson, M. N., Bondell, H. D., Mertig, A. G. & Moore, S. E. (2013). Environmental, Institutional, and Demographic Predictors of Environmental Literacy among Middle School Children. PLOS ONE, 8 (3), e59519. Retrieved Jun 22, 2022. from https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059519 Wilke, R. (Ed.). (1995). Environmental Education Literacy/Needs Assessment Project: Assessing Environmental Literacy of Students and Environmental Education Needs of Teachers; Final Report for 1993–1995 (30–76). (Report to NCEET/University of Michigan under U.S. EPA Grant #NT901935-01-2). University of Wisconsin – Stevens Point.",
publisher = "Germany : European Educational Research Association",
journal = "ECER",
title = "Environmental Literacy Development and the Role of Environmental Elective Elementary School Course: Case of Serbian Education",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ipir_1131"
}
Blagdanić, S., Marušić Jablanović, M., Stanišić, J., Veinović, Z.,& Savić, S.. (2024). Environmental Literacy Development and the Role of Environmental Elective Elementary School Course: Case of Serbian Education. in ECER
Germany : European Educational Research Association..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ipir_1131
Blagdanić S, Marušić Jablanović M, Stanišić J, Veinović Z, Savić S. Environmental Literacy Development and the Role of Environmental Elective Elementary School Course: Case of Serbian Education. in ECER. 2024;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ipir_1131 .
Blagdanić, Sanja, Marušić Jablanović, Milica, Stanišić, Jelena, Veinović, Zorica, Savić, Slađana, "Environmental Literacy Development and the Role of Environmental Elective Elementary School Course: Case of Serbian Education" in ECER (2024),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ipir_1131 .

Skala Nova ekološka paradigma iz perspektive ekoloških narativa budućih učitelja i vaspitača

Veinović, Zorica; Stanišić, Jelena

(Beograd : Učiteljski fakultet, 2023)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Veinović, Zorica
AU  - Stanišić, Jelena
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://ipir.ipisr.org.rs/handle/123456789/937
AB  - Скалом Нова еколошка парадигма (НЕП скала) испитује се еколошки поглед
на свет, a резултати се могу користити и за процену ефикасности еколошког васпитања и
образовања и пројектовање образовне политике. Упркос широкој употреби, скала је предмет
критика. У намери да проверимо претпоставке истраживача о проблематичности тврдњи
у скали, те подстакнути ширим контекстом примене НЕП скале, приступили смо квалитативном истраживању. Циљ је био да боље сагледамо размишљања испитаника која стоје иза
њихових процена тврдњи у НЕП скали. Узорак су били студенти Учитељског факултета Универзитета у Београду. Коришћени инструменти су НЕП скала и протокол за интервју. Подаци
су обрађени помоћу програма за квалитативна истраживања MAXQDA 12. У раду износимо
део резултата ширег истраживања. Упоредна анализа одговора у скали и наратива испитаника указала је на учесталу неусклађеност између ове две категорије одговора о првој, шестој и
једанаестој тврдњи НЕП скале. Тиме је доведена у питање могућност да се НЕП скалом утврде
стварни ставови испитаника поводом ових тврдњи. Анализом наратива испитаника идентификоване су карактеристике тврдњи, које су у основи наведених проблема, а неке су изостајање еколошког контекста, неодређеност делова тврдње, сложеност формулације. Већ ови
резултати сугеришу да је ради објективнијег увида у нечији еколошки поглед на свет неопходно
ревидирати спорне тврдње у скали или је користити у комбинацији са интервјуом.
AB  - The New Ecological Paradigm scale (NEP scale) examines the environmental view of the
world and the results can be used for assessing the effectiveness of environmental education and
planning future educational policies. Despite its widespread use, the scale is subject to criticism. In
order to check the researchers’ assumptions about the problematic nature of the statements in the
scale, and encouraged by the broader context of the NEP scale application, we decided to conduct a
qualitative research. The goal was to gain a better insight into the respondents‘ thoughts underlying
their evaluations of the statements in the NEP scale. The sample consisted of the students of the
Teacher Education Faculty, University of Belgrade. The NEP scale and the interview protocol were the
instruments used in the research. The data were processed using the program for qualitative research
MAXQDA 12. In the paper, we present a part of the results of a wider research. A comparative analysis
of the responses in the scale and the respondents‘ narratives indicated a frequent discrepancy between
these two categories of the responses in the 1st, 6th and 11th statements of the NEP scale. This called
into question the possibility of using the NEP scale to determine the actual attitudes of the respondents
regarding these claims. The analysis of the respondents‘ narratives identified the characteristics of
the claims, which are the basis of the mentioned problems, and some of them include the absence
of the environmental context, the vagueness of the parts of the specific claim, the complexity of the
wording. These results suggest that, in order to gain a more objective insight into one‘s environmental
worldview, it is necessary to revise the disputed claims in the scale or use it in combination with an
interview
PB  - Beograd : Učiteljski fakultet
T2  - Inovacije u nastavi
T1  - Skala Nova ekološka paradigma iz perspektive ekoloških narativa budućih učitelja i vaspitača
T1  - Скала Нова еколошка парадигма из перспективе еколошких наратива будућих учитеља и васпитача
EP  - 53
IS  - 1
SP  - 33
VL  - 36
DO  - 10.5937/inovacije2301033V
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Veinović, Zorica and Stanišić, Jelena",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Скалом Нова еколошка парадигма (НЕП скала) испитује се еколошки поглед
на свет, a резултати се могу користити и за процену ефикасности еколошког васпитања и
образовања и пројектовање образовне политике. Упркос широкој употреби, скала је предмет
критика. У намери да проверимо претпоставке истраживача о проблематичности тврдњи
у скали, те подстакнути ширим контекстом примене НЕП скале, приступили смо квалитативном истраживању. Циљ је био да боље сагледамо размишљања испитаника која стоје иза
њихових процена тврдњи у НЕП скали. Узорак су били студенти Учитељског факултета Универзитета у Београду. Коришћени инструменти су НЕП скала и протокол за интервју. Подаци
су обрађени помоћу програма за квалитативна истраживања MAXQDA 12. У раду износимо
део резултата ширег истраживања. Упоредна анализа одговора у скали и наратива испитаника указала је на учесталу неусклађеност између ове две категорије одговора о првој, шестој и
једанаестој тврдњи НЕП скале. Тиме је доведена у питање могућност да се НЕП скалом утврде
стварни ставови испитаника поводом ових тврдњи. Анализом наратива испитаника идентификоване су карактеристике тврдњи, које су у основи наведених проблема, а неке су изостајање еколошког контекста, неодређеност делова тврдње, сложеност формулације. Већ ови
резултати сугеришу да је ради објективнијег увида у нечији еколошки поглед на свет неопходно
ревидирати спорне тврдње у скали или је користити у комбинацији са интервјуом., The New Ecological Paradigm scale (NEP scale) examines the environmental view of the
world and the results can be used for assessing the effectiveness of environmental education and
planning future educational policies. Despite its widespread use, the scale is subject to criticism. In
order to check the researchers’ assumptions about the problematic nature of the statements in the
scale, and encouraged by the broader context of the NEP scale application, we decided to conduct a
qualitative research. The goal was to gain a better insight into the respondents‘ thoughts underlying
their evaluations of the statements in the NEP scale. The sample consisted of the students of the
Teacher Education Faculty, University of Belgrade. The NEP scale and the interview protocol were the
instruments used in the research. The data were processed using the program for qualitative research
MAXQDA 12. In the paper, we present a part of the results of a wider research. A comparative analysis
of the responses in the scale and the respondents‘ narratives indicated a frequent discrepancy between
these two categories of the responses in the 1st, 6th and 11th statements of the NEP scale. This called
into question the possibility of using the NEP scale to determine the actual attitudes of the respondents
regarding these claims. The analysis of the respondents‘ narratives identified the characteristics of
the claims, which are the basis of the mentioned problems, and some of them include the absence
of the environmental context, the vagueness of the parts of the specific claim, the complexity of the
wording. These results suggest that, in order to gain a more objective insight into one‘s environmental
worldview, it is necessary to revise the disputed claims in the scale or use it in combination with an
interview",
publisher = "Beograd : Učiteljski fakultet",
journal = "Inovacije u nastavi",
title = "Skala Nova ekološka paradigma iz perspektive ekoloških narativa budućih učitelja i vaspitača, Скала Нова еколошка парадигма из перспективе еколошких наратива будућих учитеља и васпитача",
pages = "53-33",
number = "1",
volume = "36",
doi = "10.5937/inovacije2301033V"
}
Veinović, Z.,& Stanišić, J.. (2023). Skala Nova ekološka paradigma iz perspektive ekoloških narativa budućih učitelja i vaspitača. in Inovacije u nastavi
Beograd : Učiteljski fakultet., 36(1), 33-53.
https://doi.org/10.5937/inovacije2301033V
Veinović Z, Stanišić J. Skala Nova ekološka paradigma iz perspektive ekoloških narativa budućih učitelja i vaspitača. in Inovacije u nastavi. 2023;36(1):33-53.
doi:10.5937/inovacije2301033V .
Veinović, Zorica, Stanišić, Jelena, "Skala Nova ekološka paradigma iz perspektive ekoloških narativa budućih učitelja i vaspitača" in Inovacije u nastavi, 36, no. 1 (2023):33-53,
https://doi.org/10.5937/inovacije2301033V . .

The importance of sociodemographic characteristics for the development of environmental literacy

Marušić Jablanović, Milica; Stanišić, Jelena; Gundogan, Dragana; Blagdanić, Sanja; Veinović, Zorica; Đorđević, Dragana; Županec, Vera; Savić, Slađana

(Belgrade : Institute for Educational Research, 2023)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Marušić Jablanović, Milica
AU  - Stanišić, Jelena
AU  - Gundogan, Dragana
AU  - Blagdanić, Sanja
AU  - Veinović, Zorica
AU  - Đorđević, Dragana
AU  - Županec, Vera
AU  - Savić, Slađana
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://ipir.ipisr.org.rs/handle/123456789/1014
AB  - Environmental problems have gained prominence in light of the emerging global
environmental crisis and its devastating impact on all living beings (Beck, 1992; Ehrlich
& Ehrlich, 2013; Rockstrom et al. 2009). Therefore, there is a need for environmentally
literate citizens who understand the essence of these problems and are ready to respond
to the challenges they pose. Research has shown that societies and social groups react to
ecological problems differently. Socioeconomic factors are important since social groups differ in terms of their ecological knowledge and awareness as well as environmental
affect, behavior, and activism.
PB  - Belgrade : Institute for Educational Research
C3  - Towards a More Equitable Education: From Research to Change
T1  - The importance of sociodemographic characteristics for the development of environmental literacy
EP  - 61
SP  - 55
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ipir_1014
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Marušić Jablanović, Milica and Stanišić, Jelena and Gundogan, Dragana and Blagdanić, Sanja and Veinović, Zorica and Đorđević, Dragana and Županec, Vera and Savić, Slađana",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Environmental problems have gained prominence in light of the emerging global
environmental crisis and its devastating impact on all living beings (Beck, 1992; Ehrlich
& Ehrlich, 2013; Rockstrom et al. 2009). Therefore, there is a need for environmentally
literate citizens who understand the essence of these problems and are ready to respond
to the challenges they pose. Research has shown that societies and social groups react to
ecological problems differently. Socioeconomic factors are important since social groups differ in terms of their ecological knowledge and awareness as well as environmental
affect, behavior, and activism.",
publisher = "Belgrade : Institute for Educational Research",
journal = "Towards a More Equitable Education: From Research to Change",
title = "The importance of sociodemographic characteristics for the development of environmental literacy",
pages = "61-55",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ipir_1014"
}
Marušić Jablanović, M., Stanišić, J., Gundogan, D., Blagdanić, S., Veinović, Z., Đorđević, D., Županec, V.,& Savić, S.. (2023). The importance of sociodemographic characteristics for the development of environmental literacy. in Towards a More Equitable Education: From Research to Change
Belgrade : Institute for Educational Research., 55-61.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ipir_1014
Marušić Jablanović M, Stanišić J, Gundogan D, Blagdanić S, Veinović Z, Đorđević D, Županec V, Savić S. The importance of sociodemographic characteristics for the development of environmental literacy. in Towards a More Equitable Education: From Research to Change. 2023;:55-61.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ipir_1014 .
Marušić Jablanović, Milica, Stanišić, Jelena, Gundogan, Dragana, Blagdanić, Sanja, Veinović, Zorica, Đorđević, Dragana, Županec, Vera, Savić, Slađana, "The importance of sociodemographic characteristics for the development of environmental literacy" in Towards a More Equitable Education: From Research to Change (2023):55-61,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ipir_1014 .

From anthropocentrism to ecocentrism in teaching science and social studies

Veinović, Zorica P.; Stanišić, Jelena

(Univerzitet u Beogradu - Učiteljski fakultet, Beograd, 2018)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Veinović, Zorica P.
AU  - Stanišić, Jelena
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://ipir.ipisr.org.rs/handle/123456789/292
AB  - The aim of the paper is to present the ways in which the attitudes of science, technology and society towards nature and the place of mankind in it have been reflected in the Science and Social Studies curricula from the mid-20th century up to this day. We wanted to explore the manner in which the relationship between mankind and nature (man as a master of nature or a part of it) and our role in its preservation (instrumental reasons or intrinsic value of nature) were presented in the Science and Social Studies curricula over a longer period of time. Content analysis method was implemented in our research. According to the analysis, the timeline of the Science and Social Studies curricula goes from marked anthropocentrism and anatagonism between man and nature (the 50s and 60s of the 20th century), through moderate anthropocentrism with hints of ecocentrism (from the 70s up to the end of the 20th century), to the dominant ecocentrism (in the contemporary 21st century curricula). This process was slow and often out of sync with the development of scientific thought and social circumstances caused by the global environmental crisis. On the other hand, although environmental protection has been included in the analysed curricula, the reasons for its inclusion are either vague or of instrumental nature. Environmental protection arising from intrinsic values of natural entities, and not (only) serving human interests, has not found its place in the Science and Social Studies curricula yet. The opportunities for improvement of the curricula in this context have been problematised in this paper.
AB  - Antropocentrizam predstavlja shvatanje da je čovek superioran, najvažniji i najvredniji deo prirode, pa čak i njen apsolutni gospodar. Prema tom shvatanju, jedino ljudski život ima intrinzičnu vrednost, dok se biljke, životinje, mineralne sirovine smatraju sredstvima koja se mogu eksploatisati u korist čoveka. Ekocentrizam je suprotno stanovište od antropocentrizma. U središtu više nije čovek, već ekosistem, priroda, a prirodni entiteti imaju unutarnju (sebi svojstvenu) vrednost. Od šezdesetih godina 20. veka sve češće se čuju upozorenja da ljudsko društvo premašuje, kako produktivne kapacitete Zemlje, tako i njene sposobnosti da apsorbuje posledice ljudskih aktivnosti. Postalo je jasno da je antropocentrično shvatanje sa svim potonjim posledicama po životnu sredinu neodbranjivo, te da se odnos prema prirodi neizostavno mora promeniti. Razvoj nauke, tehnologije, kulture i promene u načinu života i rada ljudi utiču na stalno zastarevanje nastavnih sadržaja i nameću potrebu njihovog kontinuiranog aktuelizovanja, pa su neki od značajnih kriterijuma u njihovom izboru kriterijumi inovativnosti i savremenosti. Odgovornost i ozbiljan pristup u osavremenjivanju nastavnih programa svih predmeta na svim nivoima obrazovanja dobijaju posebnu dimenziju u kontekstu savremenih ekoloških problema, koji su nastali kao posledica antropocentričnog odnosa prema prirodi, kao i u kontekstu potrebe zaštite i unapređivanja životne sredine, čija efikasnost zavisi najpre od zaokreta od antropocentrizma ka ekocentrizmu. Ovaj zaokret predstavlja jedno od ključnih pitanja iz oblasti obrazovanja za životnu sredinu i obrazovanja za održivi razvoj, koncepata koji se s pravom tretiraju kao preduslovi za opstanak na našoj planeti. Cilj istraživanja je bio da se utvrdi način na koji su se odnos nauke, tehnologije i društva prema prirodi i mesto čoveka u njoj odražavali na programe nastave prirode i društva u periodu od pedesetih godina 20. veka do danas. U analiziranim programima ispitivali smo zastupljenost: 1. odnosa čoveka prema prirodi: čovek kao deo ili gospodar prirode; 2. razloga za brigu i zaštitu prirode (intrinzični ili instrumentalni razlozi). U istraživanju je primenjena metoda analize sadržaja. Kao materijal za analizu koristili smo programe nastave prirode i društva od pedesetih godina 20. veka do danas. U periodu koji smo istraživali uočili smo spor ali dosledan i kontinuiran trend usklađivanja svih elemenata analiziranih programa sa novim naučnim saznanjima u pogledu potrebe za izmenjenim odnosom čovečanstva prema životnoj sredini. Put koji su prešli programi nastave prirode i društva tekao je od izrazitog antropocentrizma i antagonizma između čoveka i prirode, preko umerenog antropocentrizma sa primesama ekocentrizma, do dominantnog ekocentrizma. Sa druge strane, ponekad su promene dolazile i sa decenijom zakašnjenja, često su uvođene nespretno i nedovoljno sistematično, ali ih je bilo. Obrazovni sistem je veliki i spor sistem koji ne može lako da isprati promene koje se dešavaju na društvenom planu, a ovo istraživanje je to potvrdilo. Analiza programa iz pedesetih i šezdesetih godina ukazala je na ulogu nastave pri­rode i društva tog perioda u održavanju iluzije da je čovek gospodar prirode, s pravom da je neograničeno koristi. Tako je neizbežan i zaključak da je nastava prirode i društva indirektno doprinosila narušavanju zakonitosti koje vladaju u prirodi, te ugrožavanju sposobnosti životne sredine da podrži zahteve ljudskog društva. Analiza je pokazala da je programe nastave prirode i društva sedamdesetih godina obeležio veliki paradoks. Sa jedne strane, prisutno je nastojanje da se nova saznanja o životnoj sredini, ekološkim problemima, kao i potrebi pojačane brige o njoj uvrste u pro­grame (doduše, sporadično, nesistematično). Sa druge strane, u programima su paralelno nastavili da egzistiraju elementi prevaziđenih i za stanje životne sredine opasnih znanja i stavova iz prethodnog perioda. Ipak, činjenica je da su se najveće promene desili upravo u programima sedamdesetih godina, kao i da je do njih došlo u slično vreme sa promenama u društvenim okolnostima. Rezultati analize programa iz osamdesetih godina ukazali su na slabe pomake u pogledu njihovog unapređivanja sa stanovišta potrebe zaštite životne sredine. I rezultati analize programa iz devedesetih godina nisu zadovoljavajući. Polazeći od činjenice da se već od sedamdesetih godina 20. veka u naučnim i javnim krugovima govorilo o ugroženosti prirode i prirodnih resursa, očekivali smo da će programi iz devedesetih godina biti značajno više u funkciji očuvanja životne sredine. Međutim, analiza je pokazala da nastavni programi prirode i društva u ovom periodu nisu značajnije napredovali u pogledu odnosa čoveka i prirode, kao i čovekove uloge u zaštiti prirode. U programima početkom 21. veka uočavamo dosta pozitivnih promena. U njima dominira ekocentrizam, odnosno stav da je čovek deo prirode. Međutim, naša analiza programa nastave prirode i društva je potvrdila da je pitanje odnosa čoveka i prirode sa zadatkom samodefinisanja čoveka ne spram prirode, nego u prirodi, deo procesa ekološkog učenja koji još nije ni počeo. Takođe, programima su obuhvaćeni elementi zaštite prirode, ali sa razlozima koji su ili neodređeni ili su instrumentalnog karaktera. Zaštita prirode zbog intrinzične vrednosti prirodnih entiteta, a ne (isključivo) zbog čovekovih interesa, još nisu našli mesto u programima nastave prirode i društva.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Učiteljski fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Inovacije u nastavi - časopis za savremenu nastavu
T1  - From anthropocentrism to ecocentrism in teaching science and social studies
T1  - Od antropocentrizma ka ekocentrizmu u nastavi prirode i društva
EP  - 30
IS  - 4
SP  - 15
VL  - 31
DO  - 10.5937/inovacije1804015V
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Veinović, Zorica P. and Stanišić, Jelena",
year = "2018",
abstract = "The aim of the paper is to present the ways in which the attitudes of science, technology and society towards nature and the place of mankind in it have been reflected in the Science and Social Studies curricula from the mid-20th century up to this day. We wanted to explore the manner in which the relationship between mankind and nature (man as a master of nature or a part of it) and our role in its preservation (instrumental reasons or intrinsic value of nature) were presented in the Science and Social Studies curricula over a longer period of time. Content analysis method was implemented in our research. According to the analysis, the timeline of the Science and Social Studies curricula goes from marked anthropocentrism and anatagonism between man and nature (the 50s and 60s of the 20th century), through moderate anthropocentrism with hints of ecocentrism (from the 70s up to the end of the 20th century), to the dominant ecocentrism (in the contemporary 21st century curricula). This process was slow and often out of sync with the development of scientific thought and social circumstances caused by the global environmental crisis. On the other hand, although environmental protection has been included in the analysed curricula, the reasons for its inclusion are either vague or of instrumental nature. Environmental protection arising from intrinsic values of natural entities, and not (only) serving human interests, has not found its place in the Science and Social Studies curricula yet. The opportunities for improvement of the curricula in this context have been problematised in this paper., Antropocentrizam predstavlja shvatanje da je čovek superioran, najvažniji i najvredniji deo prirode, pa čak i njen apsolutni gospodar. Prema tom shvatanju, jedino ljudski život ima intrinzičnu vrednost, dok se biljke, životinje, mineralne sirovine smatraju sredstvima koja se mogu eksploatisati u korist čoveka. Ekocentrizam je suprotno stanovište od antropocentrizma. U središtu više nije čovek, već ekosistem, priroda, a prirodni entiteti imaju unutarnju (sebi svojstvenu) vrednost. Od šezdesetih godina 20. veka sve češće se čuju upozorenja da ljudsko društvo premašuje, kako produktivne kapacitete Zemlje, tako i njene sposobnosti da apsorbuje posledice ljudskih aktivnosti. Postalo je jasno da je antropocentrično shvatanje sa svim potonjim posledicama po životnu sredinu neodbranjivo, te da se odnos prema prirodi neizostavno mora promeniti. Razvoj nauke, tehnologije, kulture i promene u načinu života i rada ljudi utiču na stalno zastarevanje nastavnih sadržaja i nameću potrebu njihovog kontinuiranog aktuelizovanja, pa su neki od značajnih kriterijuma u njihovom izboru kriterijumi inovativnosti i savremenosti. Odgovornost i ozbiljan pristup u osavremenjivanju nastavnih programa svih predmeta na svim nivoima obrazovanja dobijaju posebnu dimenziju u kontekstu savremenih ekoloških problema, koji su nastali kao posledica antropocentričnog odnosa prema prirodi, kao i u kontekstu potrebe zaštite i unapređivanja životne sredine, čija efikasnost zavisi najpre od zaokreta od antropocentrizma ka ekocentrizmu. Ovaj zaokret predstavlja jedno od ključnih pitanja iz oblasti obrazovanja za životnu sredinu i obrazovanja za održivi razvoj, koncepata koji se s pravom tretiraju kao preduslovi za opstanak na našoj planeti. Cilj istraživanja je bio da se utvrdi način na koji su se odnos nauke, tehnologije i društva prema prirodi i mesto čoveka u njoj odražavali na programe nastave prirode i društva u periodu od pedesetih godina 20. veka do danas. U analiziranim programima ispitivali smo zastupljenost: 1. odnosa čoveka prema prirodi: čovek kao deo ili gospodar prirode; 2. razloga za brigu i zaštitu prirode (intrinzični ili instrumentalni razlozi). U istraživanju je primenjena metoda analize sadržaja. Kao materijal za analizu koristili smo programe nastave prirode i društva od pedesetih godina 20. veka do danas. U periodu koji smo istraživali uočili smo spor ali dosledan i kontinuiran trend usklađivanja svih elemenata analiziranih programa sa novim naučnim saznanjima u pogledu potrebe za izmenjenim odnosom čovečanstva prema životnoj sredini. Put koji su prešli programi nastave prirode i društva tekao je od izrazitog antropocentrizma i antagonizma između čoveka i prirode, preko umerenog antropocentrizma sa primesama ekocentrizma, do dominantnog ekocentrizma. Sa druge strane, ponekad su promene dolazile i sa decenijom zakašnjenja, često su uvođene nespretno i nedovoljno sistematično, ali ih je bilo. Obrazovni sistem je veliki i spor sistem koji ne može lako da isprati promene koje se dešavaju na društvenom planu, a ovo istraživanje je to potvrdilo. Analiza programa iz pedesetih i šezdesetih godina ukazala je na ulogu nastave pri­rode i društva tog perioda u održavanju iluzije da je čovek gospodar prirode, s pravom da je neograničeno koristi. Tako je neizbežan i zaključak da je nastava prirode i društva indirektno doprinosila narušavanju zakonitosti koje vladaju u prirodi, te ugrožavanju sposobnosti životne sredine da podrži zahteve ljudskog društva. Analiza je pokazala da je programe nastave prirode i društva sedamdesetih godina obeležio veliki paradoks. Sa jedne strane, prisutno je nastojanje da se nova saznanja o životnoj sredini, ekološkim problemima, kao i potrebi pojačane brige o njoj uvrste u pro­grame (doduše, sporadično, nesistematično). Sa druge strane, u programima su paralelno nastavili da egzistiraju elementi prevaziđenih i za stanje životne sredine opasnih znanja i stavova iz prethodnog perioda. Ipak, činjenica je da su se najveće promene desili upravo u programima sedamdesetih godina, kao i da je do njih došlo u slično vreme sa promenama u društvenim okolnostima. Rezultati analize programa iz osamdesetih godina ukazali su na slabe pomake u pogledu njihovog unapređivanja sa stanovišta potrebe zaštite životne sredine. I rezultati analize programa iz devedesetih godina nisu zadovoljavajući. Polazeći od činjenice da se već od sedamdesetih godina 20. veka u naučnim i javnim krugovima govorilo o ugroženosti prirode i prirodnih resursa, očekivali smo da će programi iz devedesetih godina biti značajno više u funkciji očuvanja životne sredine. Međutim, analiza je pokazala da nastavni programi prirode i društva u ovom periodu nisu značajnije napredovali u pogledu odnosa čoveka i prirode, kao i čovekove uloge u zaštiti prirode. U programima početkom 21. veka uočavamo dosta pozitivnih promena. U njima dominira ekocentrizam, odnosno stav da je čovek deo prirode. Međutim, naša analiza programa nastave prirode i društva je potvrdila da je pitanje odnosa čoveka i prirode sa zadatkom samodefinisanja čoveka ne spram prirode, nego u prirodi, deo procesa ekološkog učenja koji još nije ni počeo. Takođe, programima su obuhvaćeni elementi zaštite prirode, ali sa razlozima koji su ili neodređeni ili su instrumentalnog karaktera. Zaštita prirode zbog intrinzične vrednosti prirodnih entiteta, a ne (isključivo) zbog čovekovih interesa, još nisu našli mesto u programima nastave prirode i društva.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Učiteljski fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Inovacije u nastavi - časopis za savremenu nastavu",
title = "From anthropocentrism to ecocentrism in teaching science and social studies, Od antropocentrizma ka ekocentrizmu u nastavi prirode i društva",
pages = "30-15",
number = "4",
volume = "31",
doi = "10.5937/inovacije1804015V"
}
Veinović, Z. P.,& Stanišić, J.. (2018). From anthropocentrism to ecocentrism in teaching science and social studies. in Inovacije u nastavi - časopis za savremenu nastavu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Učiteljski fakultet, Beograd., 31(4), 15-30.
https://doi.org/10.5937/inovacije1804015V
Veinović ZP, Stanišić J. From anthropocentrism to ecocentrism in teaching science and social studies. in Inovacije u nastavi - časopis za savremenu nastavu. 2018;31(4):15-30.
doi:10.5937/inovacije1804015V .
Veinović, Zorica P., Stanišić, Jelena, "From anthropocentrism to ecocentrism in teaching science and social studies" in Inovacije u nastavi - časopis za savremenu nastavu, 31, no. 4 (2018):15-30,
https://doi.org/10.5937/inovacije1804015V . .
2