Bodroški Spariosu, Biljana

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
6e9c3b15-4473-401c-81e7-fa3304e62718
  • Bodroški Spariosu, Biljana (3)
Projects
No records found.

Author's Bibliography

Foreword

Lalić-Vučetić, Nataša; Bodroški Spariosu, Biljana; Komar, Zvonimir

(Belgrade : Institute for Educational Research, 2023)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Lalić-Vučetić, Nataša
AU  - Bodroški Spariosu, Biljana
AU  - Komar, Zvonimir
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://ipir.ipisr.org.rs/handle/123456789/1030
AB  - The papers collected in the book Motivation in education: Challenges and different
perspectives in research, all written in the past two years, constitute an attempt
to emphasize the significance of researching motivation in different educational
contexts. The selection of these thirteen chapters was based on the desire to
present a more comprehensive framework that would allow for the understanding
of different individual perspectives in research on motivation in education. In
spite of a certain degree of thematic dispersion, primarily stemming from authors’
personal choices and professional preferences, the papers aim to encourage
the resurgence of and reflection on critical issues in research on motivation and
education (education philosophy – the dominant perspective on the nature of
motivation in pedagogy; the conceptualization of motivation in higher education,
motivation in mathematics and science in different countries; the motivational
constructs of PISA and STEM education; the link between motivation and emotion
and strategies for connecting these areas; parents’ beliefs and student motivation;
the learning environment and parental support; the contextualization of teacher
motivation; teacher motivation and the development of the teaching profession;
on motivation and boredom in class; different school practices and motivation;
analyzing and reviewing published papers on motivation in journals; and more).
Sharing their research results and thoughts on motivation and offering different
insights and analyses, the authors showed immense dedication to this endeavor.
They demonstrated their professional work in action and showcased it to actors
in education as proof that it can be likened to a case study process aimed to
encourage collaboration and active reflection.
PB  - Belgrade : Institute for Educational Research
T2  - Motivation in education: challenges and different perspectives in research
T1  - Foreword
EP  - 13
SP  - 7
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ipir_1030
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Lalić-Vučetić, Nataša and Bodroški Spariosu, Biljana and Komar, Zvonimir",
year = "2023",
abstract = "The papers collected in the book Motivation in education: Challenges and different
perspectives in research, all written in the past two years, constitute an attempt
to emphasize the significance of researching motivation in different educational
contexts. The selection of these thirteen chapters was based on the desire to
present a more comprehensive framework that would allow for the understanding
of different individual perspectives in research on motivation in education. In
spite of a certain degree of thematic dispersion, primarily stemming from authors’
personal choices and professional preferences, the papers aim to encourage
the resurgence of and reflection on critical issues in research on motivation and
education (education philosophy – the dominant perspective on the nature of
motivation in pedagogy; the conceptualization of motivation in higher education,
motivation in mathematics and science in different countries; the motivational
constructs of PISA and STEM education; the link between motivation and emotion
and strategies for connecting these areas; parents’ beliefs and student motivation;
the learning environment and parental support; the contextualization of teacher
motivation; teacher motivation and the development of the teaching profession;
on motivation and boredom in class; different school practices and motivation;
analyzing and reviewing published papers on motivation in journals; and more).
Sharing their research results and thoughts on motivation and offering different
insights and analyses, the authors showed immense dedication to this endeavor.
They demonstrated their professional work in action and showcased it to actors
in education as proof that it can be likened to a case study process aimed to
encourage collaboration and active reflection.",
publisher = "Belgrade : Institute for Educational Research",
journal = "Motivation in education: challenges and different perspectives in research",
booktitle = "Foreword",
pages = "13-7",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ipir_1030"
}
Lalić-Vučetić, N., Bodroški Spariosu, B.,& Komar, Z.. (2023). Foreword. in Motivation in education: challenges and different perspectives in research
Belgrade : Institute for Educational Research., 7-13.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ipir_1030
Lalić-Vučetić N, Bodroški Spariosu B, Komar Z. Foreword. in Motivation in education: challenges and different perspectives in research. 2023;:7-13.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ipir_1030 .
Lalić-Vučetić, Nataša, Bodroški Spariosu, Biljana, Komar, Zvonimir, "Foreword" in Motivation in education: challenges and different perspectives in research (2023):7-13,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ipir_1030 .

Konceptualizacija motivacije u visokoškolskom obrazovanju: obrazovna politika Evropske unije

Bodroški Spariosu, Biljana

(Beograd : Institut za pedagoška istraživanja, 2020)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Bodroški Spariosu, Biljana
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://ipir.ipisr.org.rs/handle/123456789/512
AB  - Cilj rada je kritička ananliza konceptualizacije motivacije za obrazovanjem u političkim dokumentima
Evropske unije. Na primeru serije objavljenih Komunikacija Evropske komisije u poslednje dve
decenije sagledavaju se ključne karakteristike konceptualizacije motivacije za visokim obrazovanjem.
S obzirom na to da Evropska komisija nema legislativna ovlašćenja nad sistemima obrazovanja
država članica, ona svoj uticaj može ostvariti pomoću organizovanih političkih inicijativa i iznošenjem
svog mišljenja. Komunikacije Evropske komisije predstavljaju značajan vid javnog promovisanja
mišljenja, vizija i vrednosti EU u politici visokog obrazovanja. Analizom sadržaja sedam objavljenih
Komunikacija u periodu od 2003. do 2018. godine može se zaključiti da obrazovna politika Evropske
unije tematizuje problem motivacije za visokoškolskim obrazovanjem prevashodno instrumentalno,
kao deo ekonomske agende razvoja društva. Prećutno se podrazumeva dominacija spoljašnje
motivacije u sistemu visokog obrazovanja. Visoko obrazovanje se shvata kao usluga, student kao
korisnik obrazovnih usluga, a problem individualne motivacije za obrazovanjem konceptualizuje se
kao investiranje u ljudski kapital. Sa stanovišta obrazovnih institucija, motivacija za obrazovanjem se
razmatra kao problem ponude obrazovnih usluga i usklađivanja sa aktuelnim i budućim potrebama
tržišta rada. Vrednost visokog obrazovanja u celini razmatra se iz ekonomske perspektive. Pedagoške
implikacije svođenja složenog procesa motivacije za obrazovanjem u okviru celokupnog sistema
visokog obrazovanja na instrumentalne spoljašnje podsticaje može se opisati kao redukcionizam,
odnosno zanemarivanje mnogostrukih motiva i vrednosti koji visoko obrazovanje čine socijalno
poželjnim i individualno potrebnim.
AB  - The aim of this paper is a critical analysis of conceptualization of motivation for education in the
European Union political documents. The key characteristics of conceptualization of motivation for
higher education are deliberated on the example of a collection of published European Commission
Communications in the past two decades. Given that the European Commission has no legislative
powers over education systems of the member states, it exerts its influence through instruments of
organized policy initiatives and expression of its opinions. European Commission Communications
represent an important form of public promotion of EU opinions, visions, and values in higher
education policy. By analysing the content of seven published Communications in the period from
2003 to 2018, it can be concluded that in the European Union educational policy, the problem of
motivation for higher education is perceived primarily instrumentally, as a part of economic agenda
of society development. Dominance of external motivation in the higher education system is tacitly
assumed. Higher education is understood as service, the student as user of educational services,
and the problem of individual motivation for education is conceptualized as investment in human
capital. From the point of view of educational institutions, motivation for education is perceived as
the problem of offering educational services and harmonization with current and future needs of the
labour market. The value of higher education as a whole is considered from economic perspective.
Pedagogical implications of reducing a complex process of motivation for education in the entire
higher education system to instrumental external incentives, can be described as reductionism, i.e.
neglect of multiple motives and values that make higher education socially desirable and individually
necessary.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za pedagoška istraživanja
C3  - Motivacija u obrazovanju između teorije i prakse
T1  - Konceptualizacija motivacije u visokoškolskom obrazovanju: obrazovna politika Evropske unije
T1  - Conceptualization of motivation in higher education: European union educational policy
EP  - 99
SP  - 98
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ipir_512
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Bodroški Spariosu, Biljana",
year = "2020",
abstract = "Cilj rada je kritička ananliza konceptualizacije motivacije za obrazovanjem u političkim dokumentima
Evropske unije. Na primeru serije objavljenih Komunikacija Evropske komisije u poslednje dve
decenije sagledavaju se ključne karakteristike konceptualizacije motivacije za visokim obrazovanjem.
S obzirom na to da Evropska komisija nema legislativna ovlašćenja nad sistemima obrazovanja
država članica, ona svoj uticaj može ostvariti pomoću organizovanih političkih inicijativa i iznošenjem
svog mišljenja. Komunikacije Evropske komisije predstavljaju značajan vid javnog promovisanja
mišljenja, vizija i vrednosti EU u politici visokog obrazovanja. Analizom sadržaja sedam objavljenih
Komunikacija u periodu od 2003. do 2018. godine može se zaključiti da obrazovna politika Evropske
unije tematizuje problem motivacije za visokoškolskim obrazovanjem prevashodno instrumentalno,
kao deo ekonomske agende razvoja društva. Prećutno se podrazumeva dominacija spoljašnje
motivacije u sistemu visokog obrazovanja. Visoko obrazovanje se shvata kao usluga, student kao
korisnik obrazovnih usluga, a problem individualne motivacije za obrazovanjem konceptualizuje se
kao investiranje u ljudski kapital. Sa stanovišta obrazovnih institucija, motivacija za obrazovanjem se
razmatra kao problem ponude obrazovnih usluga i usklađivanja sa aktuelnim i budućim potrebama
tržišta rada. Vrednost visokog obrazovanja u celini razmatra se iz ekonomske perspektive. Pedagoške
implikacije svođenja složenog procesa motivacije za obrazovanjem u okviru celokupnog sistema
visokog obrazovanja na instrumentalne spoljašnje podsticaje može se opisati kao redukcionizam,
odnosno zanemarivanje mnogostrukih motiva i vrednosti koji visoko obrazovanje čine socijalno
poželjnim i individualno potrebnim., The aim of this paper is a critical analysis of conceptualization of motivation for education in the
European Union political documents. The key characteristics of conceptualization of motivation for
higher education are deliberated on the example of a collection of published European Commission
Communications in the past two decades. Given that the European Commission has no legislative
powers over education systems of the member states, it exerts its influence through instruments of
organized policy initiatives and expression of its opinions. European Commission Communications
represent an important form of public promotion of EU opinions, visions, and values in higher
education policy. By analysing the content of seven published Communications in the period from
2003 to 2018, it can be concluded that in the European Union educational policy, the problem of
motivation for higher education is perceived primarily instrumentally, as a part of economic agenda
of society development. Dominance of external motivation in the higher education system is tacitly
assumed. Higher education is understood as service, the student as user of educational services,
and the problem of individual motivation for education is conceptualized as investment in human
capital. From the point of view of educational institutions, motivation for education is perceived as
the problem of offering educational services and harmonization with current and future needs of the
labour market. The value of higher education as a whole is considered from economic perspective.
Pedagogical implications of reducing a complex process of motivation for education in the entire
higher education system to instrumental external incentives, can be described as reductionism, i.e.
neglect of multiple motives and values that make higher education socially desirable and individually
necessary.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za pedagoška istraživanja",
journal = "Motivacija u obrazovanju između teorije i prakse",
title = "Konceptualizacija motivacije u visokoškolskom obrazovanju: obrazovna politika Evropske unije, Conceptualization of motivation in higher education: European union educational policy",
pages = "99-98",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ipir_512"
}
Bodroški Spariosu, B.. (2020). Konceptualizacija motivacije u visokoškolskom obrazovanju: obrazovna politika Evropske unije. in Motivacija u obrazovanju između teorije i prakse
Beograd : Institut za pedagoška istraživanja., 98-99.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ipir_512
Bodroški Spariosu B. Konceptualizacija motivacije u visokoškolskom obrazovanju: obrazovna politika Evropske unije. in Motivacija u obrazovanju između teorije i prakse. 2020;:98-99.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ipir_512 .
Bodroški Spariosu, Biljana, "Konceptualizacija motivacije u visokoškolskom obrazovanju: obrazovna politika Evropske unije" in Motivacija u obrazovanju između teorije i prakse (2020):98-99,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ipir_512 .

Konceptualizacija roditeljstva u političkoj agendi međunarodnih organizacija

Bodroški Spariosu, Biljana; Senić Ružić, Mirjana

(Beograd : Institut za pedagoška istraživanja, 2019)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Bodroški Spariosu, Biljana
AU  - Senić Ružić, Mirjana
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://ipir.ipisr.org.rs/handle/123456789/556
AB  - U sklopu internacionalizacije političke podrške porodici i roditeljstvu značajna uloga pripada
međunarodnim organizacijama, kao što su Svetska banka, Organizacija za ekonomsku saradnju i
razvoj i Evropska unija. Cilj ovog rada predstavlja analiza konceptualizacije roditeljstva u zvaničnim
dokumentima i relevantnim publikacijama ovih organizacija u poslednje dve decenije, kao i njene
pedagoške implikacije razmatrane sa stanovišta kritičke teorije. Metodom analize sadržaja u
istraživanju je utvrđeno da se roditeljstvo konceptualizuje kao skup veština usmerenih na postizanje
predvidivih ishoda dečjeg razvoja. Roditeljske veštine sagledavaju se kao jedna vrsta socijalne
investicije. Ulaganje u učenje roditeljskih veština donosi dugoročne koristi pojedincima i društvu koje
prevazilaze inicijalne troškove. Iako se teorijska orijentacija ne eksplicira u međunarodnoj političkoj
agendi, jasno se može zaključiti da je zasnovana na postavkama teorije ljudskog kapitala. Na osnovu
obavljenog istraživanja može se konstatovati da roditeljska uloga u pomenutoj agendi ima ključni
značaj u obezbeđivanju podsticajne sredine za učenje deteta i njegov ukupni budući prosperitet,
nezavisno od sistemskih ili strukturnih karakteristika društva. Ona je višedimenzionalna i može se
opisati kao: (a) instrumentalna, jer predstavlja ključni faktor rešavanja društvenih problema velikih
razmera; fokus nije na inherentnoj vrednosti „biti roditelj”, već na funkcionalnoj vrednosti – „obavljati
posao roditelja”; (b) globalno normativno određena u smislu „pozitivnog” ili „dobrog” roditeljstva i (c)
suštinski vulnerabilna, što znači da je svim roditeljima potrebna određena vrsta ekspertske podrške, a
ne samo targetiranim grupama. Sa stanovišta kritičke teorije, pedagoška kritika ovih postavki dovodi
u pitanje tendenciju instrumentalizacije, dekontekstualizacije i „profesionalizacije roditeljstva”.
AB  - Within internationalization of political support to family and parenting, significant role belongs to
international organizations such as the World Bank, the Organization for Economic Co-operation
and Development and the European Union. The goal of this paper is the analysis of parenting
conceptualization in official documents and relevant publications of these organizations. The parenting
is conceptualized as the set of skills directed to fostering the predictable outcomes of children’s
development. The parenting skills are perceived as a type of social investment. The investment into
learning parenting skills brings long-term benefits both to individuals and society, which surpass
the initial costs. The significance of parenting competences is of a special importance in the period
of early childhood and adolescence for two reasons. The first one is that there are critical periods in
encouraging development of certain outcomes in children, and the second one is cumulativeness of
learning process due to which the missed opportunities may decrease efficiency of future learning
during life cycle. It is viewed that the parenting role is of crucial significance in providing a stimulating
environment for a child’s learning and his/her comprehensive future prosperity regardless of the
system or structural characteristics of a society. It is multidimensional and can be described as: (a)
instrumental, since it represents the key factor in resolving large-scale social problems. The focus is
not on inherent value of “being a parent” but on functional value – “performing a job of a parent”;
(b) normatively specified on the global level in the sense of “positive” or “good” parenting and (c)
essentially vulnerable, which means that all parents need a certain type of professional support and
not only the targeted groups. Pedagogical critique of these postulates questions the tendency of
instrumentalisation, de-contextualization and “professionalization of parenting”.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za pedagoška istraživanja
C3  - Obrazovanje u funkciji modernizacije društva
T1  - Konceptualizacija roditeljstva u političkoj agendi međunarodnih organizacija
T1  - Conceptualization of parenting in political agendas of international organizations
EP  - 59
SP  - 58
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ipir_556
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Bodroški Spariosu, Biljana and Senić Ružić, Mirjana",
year = "2019",
abstract = "U sklopu internacionalizacije političke podrške porodici i roditeljstvu značajna uloga pripada
međunarodnim organizacijama, kao što su Svetska banka, Organizacija za ekonomsku saradnju i
razvoj i Evropska unija. Cilj ovog rada predstavlja analiza konceptualizacije roditeljstva u zvaničnim
dokumentima i relevantnim publikacijama ovih organizacija u poslednje dve decenije, kao i njene
pedagoške implikacije razmatrane sa stanovišta kritičke teorije. Metodom analize sadržaja u
istraživanju je utvrđeno da se roditeljstvo konceptualizuje kao skup veština usmerenih na postizanje
predvidivih ishoda dečjeg razvoja. Roditeljske veštine sagledavaju se kao jedna vrsta socijalne
investicije. Ulaganje u učenje roditeljskih veština donosi dugoročne koristi pojedincima i društvu koje
prevazilaze inicijalne troškove. Iako se teorijska orijentacija ne eksplicira u međunarodnoj političkoj
agendi, jasno se može zaključiti da je zasnovana na postavkama teorije ljudskog kapitala. Na osnovu
obavljenog istraživanja može se konstatovati da roditeljska uloga u pomenutoj agendi ima ključni
značaj u obezbeđivanju podsticajne sredine za učenje deteta i njegov ukupni budući prosperitet,
nezavisno od sistemskih ili strukturnih karakteristika društva. Ona je višedimenzionalna i može se
opisati kao: (a) instrumentalna, jer predstavlja ključni faktor rešavanja društvenih problema velikih
razmera; fokus nije na inherentnoj vrednosti „biti roditelj”, već na funkcionalnoj vrednosti – „obavljati
posao roditelja”; (b) globalno normativno određena u smislu „pozitivnog” ili „dobrog” roditeljstva i (c)
suštinski vulnerabilna, što znači da je svim roditeljima potrebna određena vrsta ekspertske podrške, a
ne samo targetiranim grupama. Sa stanovišta kritičke teorije, pedagoška kritika ovih postavki dovodi
u pitanje tendenciju instrumentalizacije, dekontekstualizacije i „profesionalizacije roditeljstva”., Within internationalization of political support to family and parenting, significant role belongs to
international organizations such as the World Bank, the Organization for Economic Co-operation
and Development and the European Union. The goal of this paper is the analysis of parenting
conceptualization in official documents and relevant publications of these organizations. The parenting
is conceptualized as the set of skills directed to fostering the predictable outcomes of children’s
development. The parenting skills are perceived as a type of social investment. The investment into
learning parenting skills brings long-term benefits both to individuals and society, which surpass
the initial costs. The significance of parenting competences is of a special importance in the period
of early childhood and adolescence for two reasons. The first one is that there are critical periods in
encouraging development of certain outcomes in children, and the second one is cumulativeness of
learning process due to which the missed opportunities may decrease efficiency of future learning
during life cycle. It is viewed that the parenting role is of crucial significance in providing a stimulating
environment for a child’s learning and his/her comprehensive future prosperity regardless of the
system or structural characteristics of a society. It is multidimensional and can be described as: (a)
instrumental, since it represents the key factor in resolving large-scale social problems. The focus is
not on inherent value of “being a parent” but on functional value – “performing a job of a parent”;
(b) normatively specified on the global level in the sense of “positive” or “good” parenting and (c)
essentially vulnerable, which means that all parents need a certain type of professional support and
not only the targeted groups. Pedagogical critique of these postulates questions the tendency of
instrumentalisation, de-contextualization and “professionalization of parenting”.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za pedagoška istraživanja",
journal = "Obrazovanje u funkciji modernizacije društva",
title = "Konceptualizacija roditeljstva u političkoj agendi međunarodnih organizacija, Conceptualization of parenting in political agendas of international organizations",
pages = "59-58",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ipir_556"
}
Bodroški Spariosu, B.,& Senić Ružić, M.. (2019). Konceptualizacija roditeljstva u političkoj agendi međunarodnih organizacija. in Obrazovanje u funkciji modernizacije društva
Beograd : Institut za pedagoška istraživanja., 58-59.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ipir_556
Bodroški Spariosu B, Senić Ružić M. Konceptualizacija roditeljstva u političkoj agendi međunarodnih organizacija. in Obrazovanje u funkciji modernizacije društva. 2019;:58-59.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ipir_556 .
Bodroški Spariosu, Biljana, Senić Ružić, Mirjana, "Konceptualizacija roditeljstva u političkoj agendi međunarodnih organizacija" in Obrazovanje u funkciji modernizacije društva (2019):58-59,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ipir_556 .