Show simple item record

Dual education and equity : review from the perspective of french sociology of education

dc.contributorStanišić, Jelena
dc.contributorRadulović, Mladen
dc.creatorJarić, Isidora
dc.creatorRadulović, Mladen
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-15T10:34:15Z
dc.date.available2021-07-15T10:34:15Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.isbn978-86-7447-147-0
dc.identifier.urihttp://ipir.ipisr.org.rs/handle/123456789/549
dc.description.abstractImajući na umu da je Strategijom razvoja obrazovanja u Srbiji primećeno da u obrazovanju u Srbiji postoji „problem sa pravednošću” i da je kao jedan od ciljeva razvoja obrazovanja navedeno stvaranje „socijalno pravičnog društva”, u ovom radu se preispituje u kojoj meri su donošenje Zakona o dualnom obrazovanju i javno insistiranje na ekspanziji ovog vida obrazovanja koraci usmereni ka smanjenju nejednakosti. Oslanjajući se na ideje različitih francuskih sociologa obrazovanja (Burdije, Budon, Bodlo i Estable), kroz rad se ispituje u kojoj meri dualno obrazovanje otvara prostor za izjednačavanje obrazovnih šansi i uspostavljanje pravičnijeg društva. Iz teorijskih uvida spomenutih autora koji se tiču povezanosti klasnih struktura sa obrazovnim šansama, može se zaključiti da svako „grananje” unutar obrazovnog sistema doprinosi većim nejednakostima, o čemu eksplicitno govori Rejmon Budon. Odlike dualnog obrazovanja podsećaju na „primarno zanatsko” obrazovanje o kojem govore Bodlo i Estable koji pokazuju da je ovakvo obrazovanje predviđeno za učenike iz neprivilegovanih društvenih slojeva kojima se kroz ovaj vid obrazovanja ograničava mogućnost vertikalne društvene pokretljivosti. Analizirajući različite interesne optike aktera, Burdije smatra da opšte obrazovanje, nasuprot obuci u firmi, radnicima daje određeni vid slobode, jer ih čini manje vezanim za jedno preduzeće. Školski sistem povezan sa industrijom, prema mišljenju ovog autora, oblikovan je interesima poslodavaca i suprotan je interesima radnika, jer čini društvo manje pravičnim umanjujući šanse za vertikalnu i horizontalnu društvenu pokretljivost. Na osnovu navedenog se može zaključiti da dualno obrazovanje ne doprinosi smanjenju društvenih nejednakosti, te da bi u cilju stvaranja pravičnijeg društva od ovakvih obrazovnih politika trebalo odustati.sr
dc.description.abstractBearing in mind that the Strategy for Education Development in Serbia perceives the existence of a “justice issue” in education in Serbia, and that one of the stated goals of education development is creating a “socially just society”, this paper explores to which extent adopting the Law on Dual Education and public insistence on expansion of this mode of education are the steps towards reducing injustice. Relying on the ideas of different French sociologists of education (Bourdieu, Boudon, Baudelot and Establet), the paper examines to which extent dual education opens up the space for balancing educational opportunities and establishing a more just society. From theoretical insights of the aforementioned authors regarding the relation between class structures and educational opportunities, it can be concluded that any “branching” within an educational system contributes to greater inequalities, as explicitly asserted by Raymond Boudon. The characteristics of dual education correlate to the “primary professional” education mentioned by Baudelot and Establet, illustrating that such education is intended for students from underprivileged social strata, who have limited opportunities for vertical social mobility due to this kind of education. By analysing various interest optics of the actors, Bourdieu finds that general education, as opposed to company training, provides workers with a certain form of freedom because it makes them less attached to a single company. The school system associated with industry, in the opinion of this author, is shaped by the interests of employers and contrary to the interests of workers, as it makes society less fair by reducing the chances of vertical and horizontal social mobility. Based on the above, it can be concluded that dual education does not contribute to reducing social inequalities, and that in order to create a fairer society, such educational policies should be abandoned.sr
dc.language.isosrsr
dc.language.isoensr
dc.publisherBeograd : Institut za pedagoška istraživanjasr
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/Basic Research (BR or ON)/179034/RS//sr
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/Integrated and Interdisciplinary Research (IIR or III)/47008/RS//sr
dc.rightsopenAccesssr
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceObrazovanje u funkciji modernizacije društvasr
dc.subjectdualno obrazovanjesr
dc.subjectobrazovne politikesr
dc.subjectpravičnostsr
dc.subjectsociologija obrazovanjasr
dc.subjectSrbijasr
dc.subjectdual educationsr
dc.subjecteducational policiessr
dc.subjectequitysr
dc.subjectsociology of educationsr
dc.subjectSerbiasr
dc.titleDualno obrazovanje i pravičnost : osvrt iz perspektive Francuske sociologije obrazovanjasr
dc.titleDual education and equity : review from the perspective of french sociology of educationsr
dc.typeconferenceObjectsr
dc.rights.licenseBYsr
dc.citation.epage45
dc.citation.spage44
dc.description.otherZbornik rezimea / 24. Međunarodna naučna konferencija "Pedagoška istraživanja i školska praksasr
dc.description.otherBook of abstracts / 24th International Scientific Conference "Educational Research and School Practice"
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://ipir.ipisr.org.rs/bitstream/id/1637/Dualno_obrazovanje_2019.pdf
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionsr


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record